[Ironruby-core] What would you like to see for a 1.0?

Jimmy Schementi Jimmy.Schementi at microsoft.com
Thu Jul 30 15:52:20 EDT 2009


And yes Ryan, this will be fixed in .NET 4.0 because they allow binding against dynamic objects. Also controlling the .NET type Ruby uses to back all its classes can make these things work too, which I’m experimenting with now.

~js

From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Riley
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 12:27 PM
To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] What would you like to see for a 1.0?

Shouldn't the WPF in .NET 4.0 fix the databinding issues? Does IronPython have a good databinding story with WPF? While it would be nice, I am not sure WPF databinding should hold up 1.0 if it has more to do with WPF than IronRuby.


Ryan Riley
ryan.riley at panesofglass.org<mailto:ryan.riley at panesofglass.org>
http://panesofglass.org/
http://wizardsofsmart.net/

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Shay Friedman <shay.friedman at gmail.com<mailto:shay.friedman at gmail.com>> wrote:
Sorry for being unclear. I can't point to a certain place where there are problems, but I do feel there are rough edges here and there. For example, I was playing with WPF the other day and I ended up converting IR types to CLR types (using to_clr_string for instance) in order to get the databinding working (for Image elements for example).

Hope it helps,

Shay.
---------------------------
Shay Friedman.
http://www.IronShay.com<http://www.ironshay.com/>
Follow me: http://twitter.com/ironshay

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Jimmy Schementi <Jimmy.Schementi at microsoft.com<mailto:Jimmy.Schementi at microsoft.com>> wrote:

Where is the .NET interop lacking? Just saying it’s lacking doesn’t really help =)



From recent threads this is the list:

-          Events on interfaces and abstract classes

-          C# operators (though I’m not sure what cases are missing)

-          .NET Attributes (though it may not happen, it’s on the list … since I’m experimenting with things now)



Anything else?



From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org<mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org> [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org<mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org>] On Behalf Of Shay Friedman
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 7:08 AM
To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org<mailto:ironruby-core at rubyforge.org>
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] What would you like to see for a 1.0?



In my opinion, IronRuby "specialité" is its .Net interop capabilities and this is the reason why people will prefer or not prefer using it. This lacks in some places and I think it should be the main focus for V1.

Shay.

---------------------------
Shay Friedman.
http://www.IronShay.com
Follow me: http://twitter.com/ironshay

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Claudio Maccari <claudio.maccari at gmail.com<mailto:claudio.maccari at gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Ben,

what about a sample for WCF & WF ?
thanks
makka

2009/7/30 Ben Hall <ben2004uk at googlemail.com<mailto:ben2004uk at googlemail.com>>:

> Hi Ryan,
>
> Thanks :) I'm currently thinking what types of samples to produce and
> I am going for more broad than deep - at least to start initially. I
> think the samples should cover both C# and Ruby, allowing both sets of
> developers to get started using IronRuby.
>
>
> Ben
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Ryan Riley<ryan.riley at panesofglass.org<mailto:ryan.riley at panesofglass.org>> wrote:
>> It was more just a statement. I know of some existing samples and blogs, and
>> I really haven't gone looking for much, but I'm sure that will be a primary
>> question from most people. I imagine stuff is up on ironruby.net<http://ironruby.net>, but a 1.0
>> release should make sure there's enough there or enough links for people to
>> get a thorough understanding (broad if not really deep).
>>
>> Ryan Riley
>> ryan.riley at panesofglass.org<mailto:ryan.riley at panesofglass.org>
>> http://panesofglass.org/
>> http://wizardsofsmart.net/
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Ben Hall <ben2004uk at googlemail.com<mailto:ben2004uk at googlemail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On the subject of CLR Interop samples - what kind of samples would you
>>> like to see beyond what currently exists (ASP.net, WPF + Powershell) -
>>> shorter more focused samples than complete apps?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Ben
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ironruby-core mailing list
>> Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org<mailto:Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org>
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org<mailto:Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org>
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>


--
Claudio Maccari
--------------------------------
http://testdrivendevelopment.wordpess.com/

_______________________________________________
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org<mailto:Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org>
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core



_______________________________________________
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org<mailto:Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org>
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core


_______________________________________________
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org<mailto:Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org>
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20090730/98cb5cd4/attachment.html>


More information about the Ironruby-core mailing list