[Ironruby-core] What would you like to see for a 1.0?

Jimmy Schementi Jimmy.Schementi at microsoft.com
Thu Jul 30 15:50:05 EDT 2009


Sounds like a bug Shay. However there is a work-around, so as long as these oddities are documented I’m not too concerned with it.

From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Riley
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 12:27 PM
To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] What would you like to see for a 1.0?

Shouldn't the WPF in .NET 4.0 fix the databinding issues? Does IronPython have a good databinding story with WPF? While it would be nice, I am not sure WPF databinding should hold up 1.0 if it has more to do with WPF than IronRuby.


Ryan Riley
ryan.riley at panesofglass.org<mailto:ryan.riley at panesofglass.org>
http://panesofglass.org/
http://wizardsofsmart.net/

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Shay Friedman <shay.friedman at gmail.com<mailto:shay.friedman at gmail.com>> wrote:
Sorry for being unclear. I can't point to a certain place where there are problems, but I do feel there are rough edges here and there. For example, I was playing with WPF the other day and I ended up converting IR types to CLR types (using to_clr_string for instance) in order to get the databinding working (for Image elements for example).

Hope it helps,

Shay.
---------------------------
Shay Friedman.
http://www.IronShay.com<http://www.ironshay.com/>
Follow me: http://twitter.com/ironshay

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Jimmy Schementi <Jimmy.Schementi at microsoft.com<mailto:Jimmy.Schementi at microsoft.com>> wrote:

Where is the .NET interop lacking? Just saying it’s lacking doesn’t really help =)



From recent threads this is the list:

-          Events on interfaces and abstract classes

-          C# operators (though I’m not sure what cases are missing)

-          .NET Attributes (though it may not happen, it’s on the list … since I’m experimenting with things now)



Anything else?



From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org<mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org> [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org<mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org>] On Behalf Of Shay Friedman
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 7:08 AM
To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org<mailto:ironruby-core at rubyforge.org>
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] What would you like to see for a 1.0?



In my opinion, IronRuby "specialité" is its .Net interop capabilities and this is the reason why people will prefer or not prefer using it. This lacks in some places and I think it should be the main focus for V1.

Shay.

---------------------------
Shay Friedman.
http://www.IronShay.com
Follow me: http://twitter.com/ironshay

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Claudio Maccari <claudio.maccari at gmail.com<mailto:claudio.maccari at gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Ben,

what about a sample for WCF & WF ?
thanks
makka

2009/7/30 Ben Hall <ben2004uk at googlemail.com<mailto:ben2004uk at googlemail.com>>:

> Hi Ryan,
>
> Thanks :) I'm currently thinking what types of samples to produce and
> I am going for more broad than deep - at least to start initially. I
> think the samples should cover both C# and Ruby, allowing both sets of
> developers to get started using IronRuby.
>
>
> Ben
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Ryan Riley<ryan.riley at panesofglass.org<mailto:ryan.riley at panesofglass.org>> wrote:
>> It was more just a statement. I know of some existing samples and blogs, and
>> I really haven't gone looking for much, but I'm sure that will be a primary
>> question from most people. I imagine stuff is up on ironruby.net<http://ironruby.net>, but a 1.0
>> release should make sure there's enough there or enough links for people to
>> get a thorough understanding (broad if not really deep).
>>
>> Ryan Riley
>> ryan.riley at panesofglass.org<mailto:ryan.riley at panesofglass.org>
>> http://panesofglass.org/
>> http://wizardsofsmart.net/
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Ben Hall <ben2004uk at googlemail.com<mailto:ben2004uk at googlemail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On the subject of CLR Interop samples - what kind of samples would you
>>> like to see beyond what currently exists (ASP.net, WPF + Powershell) -
>>> shorter more focused samples than complete apps?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Ben
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ironruby-core mailing list
>> Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org<mailto:Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org>
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org<mailto:Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org>
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>


--
Claudio Maccari
--------------------------------
http://testdrivendevelopment.wordpess.com/

_______________________________________________
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org<mailto:Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org>
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core



_______________________________________________
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org<mailto:Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org>
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core


_______________________________________________
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org<mailto:Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org>
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20090730/39483274/attachment.html>


More information about the Ironruby-core mailing list