[Ironruby-core] What would you like to see for a 1.0?
xerxesb at gmail.com
Thu Jul 30 01:06:48 EDT 2009
+1 = Definitely need events on interfaces to work again. I haven't
tried the more recent builds, but if this is still outstanding, it's a
problem for us.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Daniele
Alessandri<suppakilla at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
> 1. +1
> 2. +1
> 3. +0
> As for the third point, it is not that I would not like to have a
> performance-friendly IronRuby ASAP but I don't see this one as a
> binding prerequisite for a 1.0 release, even more so if compared to
> the rest. Having said that, OK for performances tweaks, but massive
> works on speed to eventually surpass MRI 1.8.6 should be postponed
> after IronRuby hits the 1.0 milestone, IMHO.
> PS: equal performance as 1.8.6 != performance friendly, in fact :-)
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:03, Ivan Porto Carrero<ivan at flanders.co.nz> wrote:
>> For me to be a 1.0 release I'd have to put the following things forward.
>> 1. Events on interfaces + abstract classes (a big pull is the testing that
>> ruby has to offer and many people now have the DI stuff in place so loads of
>> these things are now on interfaces)
>> 2. Passing the same amount or more specs from RubySpec as ruby 1.8.6 does.
>> 3. Be of equal or better performance as ruby 1.8.6
>> Nice to have:
>> compatibility with C# operators etc as this isn't 100% right now.
More information about the Ironruby-core