[Ironruby-core] Code Review: IronRails2
enicholson at gmail.com
Sat Oct 18 08:44:58 EDT 2008
That's great! Thanks for the update!
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Tomas Matousek <
Tomas.Matousek at microsoft.com> wrote:
> The result so far is that it is able to dispatch a request to Rails and
> send output to client. The shelveset I've just submitted implements static
> file handling (so that static file requests are not dispatched to Rails).
> *From:* ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:
> ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] *On Behalf Of *Mike Moore
> *Sent:* Friday, October 17, 2008 2:06 PM
> *To:* ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Ironruby-core] Code Review: IronRails2
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Curt Hagenlocher <curth at microsoft.com>
> There's quite a difference between a development environment like ASP.NETthat's fully supported by Microsoft and one that we make available on an
> as-is basis for the community to play with – and maybe take ownership of.
> Our goal has always been to create a fully conformant Ruby implementation,
> and by definition, that's going to be able to run Rails.
> Sure, but the word before was that any ability to run Rails with IronRuby
> was not going to come from Microsoft and would have to be provided by the
> community. This looks to be coming directly from Microsoft. You could have
> left it alone and made us proxy from IIS to webrick/mongrel or use FastCGI,
> but this is evidence of the IronRuby team going above and beyond. You are to
> be commended.
> I would like to hear more chatter about this though. What are the results
> of your experiments with IronRails so far?
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ironruby-core