[Ironruby-core] Code Review: RubyArrayPack
Tomas Matousek
Tomas.Matousek at microsoft.com
Wed May 21 18:45:29 EDT 2008
More or less. But you can also compile with /checked option and then it wouldn't work.
It's better to mark places where you expect the overflow, because you usually don't expect it.
Tomas
-----Original Message-----
From: Curt Hagenlocher
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 3:28 PM
To: Tomas Matousek; IronRuby External Code Reviewers
Cc: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
Subject: RE: Code Review: RubyArrayPack
Is the "unchecked" just a formality under C#? It's not currently throwing an exception.
IronRuby:
>>> [1000].pack('c')
=> "\350"
Matz:
irb(main):012:0> [1000].pack('c')
=> "\350"
-----Original Message-----
From: Tomas Matousek
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 3:24 PM
To: Curt Hagenlocher; IronRuby External Code Reviewers
Cc: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
Subject: RE: Code Review: RubyArrayPack
What is MRI behavior if I return a number that doesn't fit in sbyte?
writer.Write((sbyte)Protocols.CastToFixnum(context, self[i + j]));
Does it silently overflow? If so, we should use unchecked() region.
Other than that looks good.
Tomas
-----Original Message-----
From: Curt Hagenlocher
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 3:15 PM
To: IronRuby External Code Reviewers
Cc: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
Subject: Code Review: RubyArrayPack
tfpt review /shelveset:RubyArrayPack;REDMOND\curth
Significant subset of Array.pack and String.unpack
--
Curt Hagenlocher
curth at microsoft.com
More information about the Ironruby-core
mailing list