[Ironruby-core] IronRuby r100 on Mono

Ivan Porto Carrero ivan at flanders.co.nz
Thu May 8 22:54:24 EDT 2008


Did you download the sources into your home drive.  It looks like you  
need to navigate into the folder where you downloaded the ironruby  
source and then call rake :)

On 9/05/2008, at 2:09 PM, Robert Bazinet wrote:

> I am attempting to build r100 on Mono on my Mac and getting an error  
> I have not seen before.  I have followed the instructions and used  
> the provided patch.   Here is what I get:
>
> rbazinet: ~$ rake --trace compile mono=1
> rake aborted!
> No Rakefile found (looking for: rakefile, Rakefile, rakefile.rb,  
> Rakefile.rb)
> /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.1/lib/rake.rb:2143:in  
> `raw_load_rakefile'
> /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.1/lib/rake.rb:1897:in  
> `load_rakefile'
> /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.1/lib/rake.rb:1948:in  
> `standard_exception_handling'
> /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.1/lib/rake.rb:1896:in  
> `load_rakefile'
> /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.1/lib/rake.rb:1880:in `run'
> /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.1/lib/rake.rb:1948:in  
> `standard_exception_handling'
> /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.1/lib/rake.rb:1878:in `run'
> /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.1/bin/rake:31
> /usr/bin/rake:19:in `load'
> /usr/bin/rake:19
>
> Is this just some dumb I am missing?
>
> Thanks,
>    Rob Bazinet
>
>
> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Sanghyeon Seo <sanxiyn at gmail.com>  
> wrote:
> WARNING: This is against revision 100. Revision 101 will compile, but
> will not run on Mono at the time. I am still working on it. In case
> you didn't know, you can use "svn update -r 100" to "update" to
> not-the-latest version.
>
> Stuffs are in the usual place:
> http://sparcs.kaist.ac.kr/~tinuviel/download/IronRuby/
>
> patch-mono-r100 consists of four different things:
>
> 1. One-line case-sensitivity patch to Rakefile.
> 2. Workaround for long-standing console problem.
> 3. Workaround for Mono bug #387040, by changing explicit interface
> implementations to implicit one.
> 4. Workaround for Mono bug #387502, by rewriting ?? operator with if
> statement. This is a SVN regression and you don't need it if you are
> using Mono 1.9.
>
> Links to Mono bugs:
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=387040
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=387502
>
> P.S. DLR, IronPython, IronRuby team should create C# compiler test
> suite! You guys have the talent!
>
> --
> Seo Sanghyeon
> _______________________________________________
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
>
> -- 
> Rob Bazinet
> InfoQ Ruby and .NET Editor
> http://www.accidentaltechnologist.com
> _______________________________________________
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20080509/fab83d89/attachment.html>


More information about the Ironruby-core mailing list