[Ironruby-core] Littl' question about the build process
John Lam (DLR)
jflam at microsoft.com
Wed Jan 16 09:30:54 EST 2008
> As John said, IronRuby.sln is the one that is correctly transformed to
> SVN folder layout. Ruby.sln is against our TFS folder layer. Maybe we
> could rename them to make it more obvious which is which.
> Also, I'm wondering what VS version we should target with IronRuby.sln.
> Are enough people using 2008 to justify upgrading it? Or should we have
> one for 2005 and one for 2008? Or keep it 2005 for now?
To amplify this a bit more:
Is there anyone out there still using VS 2005 to hack on IronRuby?
More information about the Ironruby-core