[Ironruby-core] IronRuby (Without MVC ) and ActiveRecord... Is it Possib

Mike Moore blowmage at gmail.com
Sat Feb 2 16:36:40 EST 2008


Yes, that is the goal.  And the plan is for all the C components in the
standard library to be ported as well.

On Feb 2, 2008 9:57 AM, Michael Letterle <michael.letterle at gmail.com> wrote:

> I believe the end goal of IronRuby (and someone correct me if I'm
> wrong), is to fully support the Ruby language, meaning things like
> DataMapper, ActiveRecord, Rails, et. al. will "just work"   Of course
> some of the C components may need to be ported, but that would be
> outside of the scope of the IronRuby project.
>
> >On Sat, Feb 2, 2008 at 4:49 AM, Softmind Technology
> <lists at ruby-forum.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >  I just visted...
> >
> >  http://www.datamapper.org/
> >
> >  I think DataMapper is in strong competition with ActiveRecord, written
> >  in Pure Ruby code.
> >
> >  Merb an another framework like Rails shall be offering this ORM support
> >  along with Active Record.
> >
> >  Prado is an another framework based PHP with Asp.Net like webform
> >  features, is also offering Active Record support and its available on
> >  their website as a tutorial.
> >
> >  I think IronRuby should also think of offering this both ORM support.
> >
> >  Thanks
> >
> >  --
> >  Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> >  _______________________________________________
> >  Ironruby-core mailing list
> >  Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
> >  http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Michael Letterle
> [Polymath Programmer]
> http://michaeldotnet.blogspot.com
> _______________________________________________
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20080202/932a1e60/attachment.html 


More information about the Ironruby-core mailing list