[Ironruby-core] IronRuby (Without MVC ) and ActiveRecord... Is it Possib
blowmage at gmail.com
Sat Feb 2 16:36:40 EST 2008
Yes, that is the goal. And the plan is for all the C components in the
standard library to be ported as well.
On Feb 2, 2008 9:57 AM, Michael Letterle <michael.letterle at gmail.com> wrote:
> I believe the end goal of IronRuby (and someone correct me if I'm
> wrong), is to fully support the Ruby language, meaning things like
> DataMapper, ActiveRecord, Rails, et. al. will "just work" Of course
> some of the C components may need to be ported, but that would be
> outside of the scope of the IronRuby project.
> >On Sat, Feb 2, 2008 at 4:49 AM, Softmind Technology
> <lists at ruby-forum.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I just visted...
> > http://www.datamapper.org/
> > I think DataMapper is in strong competition with ActiveRecord, written
> > in Pure Ruby code.
> > Merb an another framework like Rails shall be offering this ORM support
> > along with Active Record.
> > Prado is an another framework based PHP with Asp.Net like webform
> > features, is also offering Active Record support and its available on
> > their website as a tutorial.
> > I think IronRuby should also think of offering this both ORM support.
> > Thanks
> > --
> > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ironruby-core mailing list
> > Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
> Michael Letterle
> [Polymath Programmer]
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ironruby-core