[Ironruby-core] Xna+IronRuby+RubyNewb=headache

Dudu Baião eduardobaiao at gmail.com
Tue Dec 16 05:23:33 EST 2008


Thanks Curt! I'll be waiting for. :)

2008/12/16 Curt Hagenlocher <curth at microsoft.com>:
> IronRuby is still in "alpha".  CLR interop is a place we know is still particularly weak.  IronPython just released version 2.0, and is considerably more mature.  If your goal is to have a fairly polished dynamic language that runs on .NET, then IronPython is probably a better choice.  If you like Ruby and don't mind a few hiccups, then your willingness to file problem reports for issues that you find will be of great help to us.
>
> Things are likely to be a bit slow over Christmas, but I'll see if I can get this fixed before the end of the year.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Gabriel Rotar
> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 12:49 PM
> To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
> Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Xna+IronRuby+RubyNewb=headache
>
> Dudu Baião wrote:
>> The IronRuby it's not passing correctly the parameters for the super
>> class methods.
>
> That is a bummer :(
> Hopeful IronRuby will improve over time.
>
> Guess I'll try with IronPython
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> _______________________________________________
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
> _______________________________________________
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>


More information about the Ironruby-core mailing list