[Ironruby-core] Regarding IronRuby... How true it sounds from this blog

Jim Deville jdeville at microsoft.com
Tue Apr 29 11:31:22 EDT 2008

Agreed. On my last project I was using git-svn for everything except for merging across SVN branches. Did that for months and loved it! Man I miss stash :)


-----Original Message-----
From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Charles Oliver Nutter
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 7:15 AM
To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Regarding IronRuby... How true it sounds from this blog

John Lam (IRONRUBY) wrote:
> The nice thing about GIT is that you can use they're GIT->SVN bridge and work in a GIT repro on your own box while syncing changes to SVN. So there's nothing stopping you from using GIT today if you want ...

I've been  using git-svn for a while now, and it's pretty nice. I'm not
using the branching all that much (don't like having long periods of
work live only on my machine) but the local committing is oddly satisfying.

- Charlie
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org

More information about the Ironruby-core mailing list