[Ironruby-core] Reply to list ... caving to popular demand
Charles Oliver Nutter
charles.nutter at sun.com
Thu Sep 13 21:39:30 EDT 2007
M. David Peterson wrote:
> True, though it also encourages off-topic discussions to take place
> off-list. I can think of countless times in which an off-topic
> conversation was both started and continued on list due to the simple fact
> that replying directly to list was easier than was composing a new email,
> copying over all relavent information, and continuing.
Good! Keep talk on list..if it's irrelevant, ignore the entire thread.
But there may be a really useful gem that comes out of the tail-end of
an off-topic conversation. Anyone who continues to have off-topic
conversations on-list can be gently prodded off-list...and besides, all
our emails are still in the "From" header anyway...it's not hard to send
just to one person.
> Of course this is the exception to the rule, but there are other points to
> * People who have been Cc'd who are not on the list can take part in the
> conversation if the list server is configured to forward responses to a
> topic from folks originally Cc'd from a list member.
I've never been on a list configured in such a way...and it seems like
an easy way for spammers to sneak by list configurations.
> * In this particular case I would venture to state that there are enough
> situations in which internal MSFT employees or external library developers
> will have need to participate in a conversation and yet forcing them to go
> through the sign-up process to take part in a single conversation is a bit
> much to expect.
If they couldn't send to the list, only the original sender would be
able to see their responses anyway. What good does that do the project?
More information about the Ironruby-core