[Ironruby-core] How our libraries stack up against the specs ...
mwatts42 at gmail.com
Wed Oct 24 12:07:34 EDT 2007
Goto http://code.google.com/p/msysgit/downloads/list and download and
This should provide you will just about everything you need to get up and
running using Git.
On 10/24/07, Eric Nicholson <enicholson at gmail.com> wrote:
> Does anyone know an easier way of getting the Rubinius source than
> installing cygwin, getting the git source code, compiling git...
> What a pain! I'm sure git is fantastic, but you can't store your portable
> RVM on a non-portable source manager!
> I really want to look at these tests. I grabbed the most recent tarball I
> could find, but the tests John included aren't in it (presumably because
> it's too old). The tests seem to have undergone a major re-organization.
> On 10/15/07, John Lam (DLR) <jflam at microsoft.com> wrote:
> > I re-implemented parts of the Rubinius test suite harness to use
> > features that *are* implemented in IronRuby. The good news is that we're
> > using the specs as written without any changes at all.
> > The spec suite driver currently looks at Array, Hash and String only.
> > If I run the driver under MRI, I see 17 failures out of 743 specs; only
> > one failure is expected. The other 16 failures are due the fact that I
> > couldn't implement that part of the test suite harness without using
> > features that IronRuby doesn't have today. So that's not a bad baseline
> > start.
> > If I run the same spec suite under IronRuby, we see 457 failures out of
> > 743, for a pass rate of 38%. If we omit String, which is the least
> > implemented of these types, our pass rate for Array and Hash rises to 58%
> > (149 fail out of 353).
> > Some of the failures are obviously due to features that aren't
> > implemented at all (mostly in String). Some of them are due to a class of
> > language features that aren't implemented (e.g. taint). Some are due to
> > known DLR bugs like the one that Martin is currently consumed with fixing.
> > The remainder are real bugs in our implementation.
> > The spec harness is a fairly sophisticated Ruby program. The team should
> > be proud of getting the language to this state so quickly!
> > I'm attaching the test dump to this mail for the curious. The shelveset
> > that contains this stuff should be ready to review tomorrow and will be
> > pushed out to SVN right after that.
> > Thanks,
> > -John
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ironruby-core mailing list
> > Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ironruby-core