[Ironruby-core] IronRuby community and communications
haacked at gmail.com
Wed Oct 3 12:03:28 EDT 2007
Forgive me if this seems like a naïve question, but since the project is
hosted on RubyForge, why not use its facilities to run the project. Is it
not up to snuff?
From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Mike Moore
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 8:27 AM
To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby community and communications
On 10/3/07, M. David Peterson <m.david at xmlhacker.com> wrote:
On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 08:36:45 -0600, William Yeung
<william.yeung.hk at gmail.com> wrote:
> If you can make this happen like how ReSharper did on the CastleProject
> community, that's really a good idea.
There's nothing I can do other than speak up and state my case as to why I
might think one thing or another would be good/bad/indifferent. As
Charlie has proven, sometimes the best way to get something accomplished
is to find ways to get people vocal about a particular topic of interest.
To be honest I'm not 100% that Groove is the perfect fit in this
particular use-case. But I think it might be. Would be fun to find out!
Any thoughts from the community at large?
I'm not opposed to Groove. It does limit contributors to those on Windows,
or have access to running Windows. I doubt that is much of a restriction
though, as testing IronRuby on *only* Mono seems rather risky. If Microsoft
could pony up Groove licenses for all contributors I'd certainly try to make
But, I'm also not opposed to running development using Trac, or some other
well known PM tool, either. The tools aren't as important to me as having a
bit more structure.
M. David Peterson
http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 |
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ironruby-core