[Instantrails-users] Instantrails or mongrel?
ldk2005 at gmail.com
Fri Jul 21 22:57:14 EDT 2006
On 7/21/06, Tim Uckun <timuckun at gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems to me if you distributed mongrel, ruby and sqllite then you
> would not need apache, mysql, or php. Would make for a much smaller
> Just a thought.
Would developing in sqlite, and deploying to MySQL require any code
changes / compromises, ( other than changing the production settings in
config.yml)? If not, then it's not worth reducing the size of the package.
For the following reasons:
1. Apache, MySQL and phpMyAdmin are known quatities that work.
2. An application developed in InstantRails can be deployed to a Liniux
hosting server without any changes. ( most of them provide MySQL).
Of course, you could create an InstantRailsLite . . . :)
On 7/22/06, Curt Hibbs <curt.hibbs at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 7/21/06, Tim Uckun <timuckun at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I was wondering if instantrails is planning on migrating to mongrel?
> > Yes. We're going to replace SCGI with Mongrel. And that should be fairly
> > soon, too (as soon as I can free up a little bandwidth).
> > Curt
> > _______________________________________________
> > Instantrails-users mailing list
> > Instantrails-users at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/instantrails-users
> Instantrails-users mailing list
> Instantrails-users at rubyforge.org
"Work, work, work...there is no satisfactory alternative."
--- E.Taft Benson
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Instantrails-users