From curt.hibbs at gmail.com Wed Sep 6 23:34:03 2006 From: curt.hibbs at gmail.com (Curt Hibbs) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 22:34:03 -0500 Subject: [Instantrails-developers] RadRails - new problem? Message-ID: <31d15f490609062034w35b33583lb09cb6ae3d1075c3@mail.gmail.com> With using RadRails 0.7.0 and Instant Rails 1.3a, I can't create a new Rails project from within RadRails using File>New>Rails>RailsProject. I seem to recall doing this sucessfully from within RadRails sometime last year (or early this year) with an earlier version of RadRails. Can any of you do this successfully? I have configured RadRails to know where IR's ruby.exe is, as well as ri, rdoc, and the rails & rake gem folders... but no luck getting it to work. Curt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/instantrails-developers/attachments/20060906/423e538e/attachment.html From curt.hibbs at gmail.com Mon Sep 18 00:29:12 2006 From: curt.hibbs at gmail.com (Curt Hibbs) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:29:12 -0500 Subject: [Instantrails-developers] Mongrel support is (almost) done in IR 1.4 Message-ID: <31d15f490609172129p306c6c6ap5b1ec7b8e848d5ad@mail.gmail.com> David, I have finished the Mongrel support (replaces SCGI) in the manager app ( InstantRails.exe) and I have it all checked in to the SVN repo. Do you have time to handle the Apache mod_proxy configuration, and possibly upgrade the included Typo to the current version? Once that's done we can release IR 1.4 and then I can move on with IR 2. Curt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/instantrails-developers/attachments/20060917/59007b89/attachment.html From bill.walton at charter.net Mon Sep 18 08:14:15 2006 From: bill.walton at charter.net (Bill Walton) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 07:14:15 -0500 Subject: [Instantrails-developers] Mongrel support is (almost) done in IR 1.4 References: <31d15f490609172129p306c6c6ap5b1ec7b8e848d5ad@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <485c01c6db1b$fa2fe2c0$6401a8c0@Presario> Curt, Is 'Start with WEBrick' still going to be on the interface? Or is Mongrel going to replace both WEBrick and SCGI? Thanks, Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: Curt Hibbs To: David Morton Cc: Instant Rails DEV Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 11:29 PM Subject: [Instantrails-developers] Mongrel support is (almost) done in IR 1.4 David, I have finished the Mongrel support (replaces SCGI) in the manager app (InstantRails.exe) and I have it all checked in to the SVN repo. Do you have time to handle the Apache mod_proxy configuration, and possibly upgrade the included Typo to the current version? Once that's done we can release IR 1.4 and then I can move on with IR 2. Curt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Instantrails-developers mailing list Instantrails-developers at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/instantrails-developers -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/instantrails-developers/attachments/20060918/2f26129a/attachment.html From mortonda at dgrmm.net Mon Sep 18 11:02:14 2006 From: mortonda at dgrmm.net (David Morton) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:02:14 -0500 Subject: [Instantrails-developers] Mongrel support is (almost) done in IR 1.4 In-Reply-To: <485c01c6db1b$fa2fe2c0$6401a8c0@Presario> References: <31d15f490609172129p306c6c6ap5b1ec7b8e848d5ad@mail.gmail.com> <485c01c6db1b$fa2fe2c0$6401a8c0@Presario> Message-ID: <450EB4F6.7090600@dgrmm.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bill Walton wrote: > Curt, > > Is 'Start with WEBrick' still going to be on the interface? Or is > Mongrel going to replace both WEBrick and SCGI? I suppose we could have both, but with mongrel, there's really no reason to use webrick; mongrel is faster and more stable. - -- David Morton Maia Mailguard - http://www.maiamailguard.com Morton Software Design and Consulting - http://www.dgrmm.net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFDrT2Uy30ODPkzl0RAirAAJ9nqVaoXUt6jnXGaGUcA6LMg/u6TACeLf8L 4vfVzcdCfxyR/gSDsHTYSR8= =CKRp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From mortonda at dgrmm.net Mon Sep 18 11:03:44 2006 From: mortonda at dgrmm.net (David Morton) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:03:44 -0500 Subject: [Instantrails-developers] Mongrel support is (almost) done in IR 1.4 In-Reply-To: <31d15f490609172129p306c6c6ap5b1ec7b8e848d5ad@mail.gmail.com> References: <31d15f490609172129p306c6c6ap5b1ec7b8e848d5ad@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <450EB550.4070204@dgrmm.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Curt Hibbs wrote: > David, > > I have finished the Mongrel support (replaces SCGI) in the manager app > (InstantRails.exe) and I have it all checked in to the SVN repo. > > Do you have time to handle the Apache mod_proxy configuration, and > possibly upgrade the included Typo to the current version? I haven't had much time lately... let me re-examine things this week. I do remember one snag, I think the load-balancing proxy support is only available in apache 2.2... Are we also upgrading Apache? - -- David Morton Maia Mailguard - http://www.maiamailguard.com Morton Software Design and Consulting - http://www.dgrmm.net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFDrVQUy30ODPkzl0RArIXAKDEEoRcpX1g7sdHSlurwQgjN63hBQCg1vnF LfJ1t7d4mxT31b8HS0qKNYk= =4zd7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From bill.walton at charter.net Mon Sep 18 12:37:59 2006 From: bill.walton at charter.net (Bill Walton) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:37:59 -0500 Subject: [Instantrails-developers] Mongrel support is (almost) done in IR 1.4 References: <31d15f490609172129p306c6c6ap5b1ec7b8e848d5ad@mail.gmail.com><485c01c6db1b$fa2fe2c0$6401a8c0@Presario> <450EB4F6.7090600@dgrmm.net> Message-ID: <49a501c6db40$cdeda010$6401a8c0@Presario> David Morton wrote: > Bill Walton wrote: >> >> Is 'Start with WEBrick' still going to be on the interface? Or is >> Mongrel going to replace both WEBrick and SCGI? > > I suppose we could have both, but with mongrel, there's really no > reason to use webrick; mongrel is faster and more stable. And Mongrel is port-configurable. I can't see why WEBrick is still needed either. As long as Mongrel can be run from the command line (or preferably from the button that's currently labeled 'Start with WEBrick') and concurrently with Apache serving a different app (e.g., phpmyadmin). Bill From curt.hibbs at gmail.com Mon Sep 18 13:02:23 2006 From: curt.hibbs at gmail.com (Curt Hibbs) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 12:02:23 -0500 Subject: [Instantrails-developers] Mongrel support is (almost) done in IR 1.4 In-Reply-To: <450EB550.4070204@dgrmm.net> References: <31d15f490609172129p306c6c6ap5b1ec7b8e848d5ad@mail.gmail.com> <450EB550.4070204@dgrmm.net> Message-ID: <31d15f490609181002j1a6bfa2es8510a1250dcb021d@mail.gmail.com> On 9/18/06, David Morton wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Curt Hibbs wrote: > > David, > > > > I have finished the Mongrel support (replaces SCGI) in the manager app > > (InstantRails.exe) and I have it all checked in to the SVN repo. > > > > Do you have time to handle the Apache mod_proxy configuration, and > > possibly upgrade the included Typo to the current version? > > I haven't had much time lately... let me re-examine things this week. The Typo upgrade is definitely optional. The main thing is that I'd trsust you doing the apache config more han myself. I do remember one snag, I think the load-balancing proxy support is only > available in apache 2.2... Are we also upgrading Apache? > No, let's stick with Apache 1 here and forego load balancing. I'm really anxious to get on with IR 2 where we will go to Apache 2 and MySQL 5. The only reason for doing this release at all, is because SCGI is out (and not really supported anymore), and I didn't want to leave IR 1 with an obsolete SCGI implementation for the next 9 to 12 months while we work on IR 2. Curt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/instantrails-developers/attachments/20060918/9f6bc654/attachment-0001.html From curt.hibbs at gmail.com Mon Sep 18 13:07:25 2006 From: curt.hibbs at gmail.com (Curt Hibbs) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 12:07:25 -0500 Subject: [Instantrails-developers] Mongrel support is (almost) done in IR 1.4 In-Reply-To: <450EB4F6.7090600@dgrmm.net> References: <31d15f490609172129p306c6c6ap5b1ec7b8e848d5ad@mail.gmail.com> <485c01c6db1b$fa2fe2c0$6401a8c0@Presario> <450EB4F6.7090600@dgrmm.net> Message-ID: <31d15f490609181007o788a2d41tad8a6709c58318e3@mail.gmail.com> On 9/18/06, David Morton wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Bill Walton wrote: > > Curt, > > > > Is 'Start with WEBrick' still going to be on the interface? Or is > > Mongrel going to replace both WEBrick and SCGI? > > I suppose we could have both, but with mongrel, there's really no reason > to use > webrick; mongrel is faster and more stable. > Yes they are both there. I added some explanatory text (see the attached screenshot). Curt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/instantrails-developers/attachments/20060918/02ec7db1/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ir-14.png Type: image/png Size: 11085 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/instantrails-developers/attachments/20060918/02ec7db1/attachment.png From curt.hibbs at gmail.com Mon Sep 18 13:41:09 2006 From: curt.hibbs at gmail.com (Curt Hibbs) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 12:41:09 -0500 Subject: [Instantrails-developers] Mongrel support is (almost) done in IR 1.4 In-Reply-To: <49a501c6db40$cdeda010$6401a8c0@Presario> References: <31d15f490609172129p306c6c6ap5b1ec7b8e848d5ad@mail.gmail.com> <485c01c6db1b$fa2fe2c0$6401a8c0@Presario> <450EB4F6.7090600@dgrmm.net> <49a501c6db40$cdeda010$6401a8c0@Presario> Message-ID: <31d15f490609181041i36330277wfc3480d8247d9c5f@mail.gmail.com> On 9/18/06, Bill Walton wrote: > > David Morton wrote: > > > Bill Walton wrote: > >> > >> Is 'Start with WEBrick' still going to be on the interface? Or is > >> Mongrel going to replace both WEBrick and SCGI? > > > > I suppose we could have both, but with mongrel, there's really no > > reason to use webrick; mongrel is faster and more stable. > > And Mongrel is port-configurable. I can't see why WEBrick is still needed > either. As long as Mongrel can be run from the command line (or > preferably > from the button that's currently labeled 'Start with WEBrick') and > concurrently with Apache serving a different app (e.g., phpmyadmin). > > WEBirck is not really needed, and could go away. For IR 1 it might be nice to keep as a just-in-case safety net. BTW, configuring the runtime mode and port effects both Mongrel *and* WEBrick. Curt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/instantrails-developers/attachments/20060918/7e120f13/attachment.html From curt.hibbs at gmail.com Mon Sep 18 13:42:19 2006 From: curt.hibbs at gmail.com (Curt Hibbs) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 12:42:19 -0500 Subject: [Instantrails-developers] Mongrel support is (almost) done in IR 1.4 In-Reply-To: <31d15f490609181041i36330277wfc3480d8247d9c5f@mail.gmail.com> References: <31d15f490609172129p306c6c6ap5b1ec7b8e848d5ad@mail.gmail.com> <485c01c6db1b$fa2fe2c0$6401a8c0@Presario> <450EB4F6.7090600@dgrmm.net> <49a501c6db40$cdeda010$6401a8c0@Presario> <31d15f490609181041i36330277wfc3480d8247d9c5f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <31d15f490609181042n6dc9186fse46edf5741c32cbe@mail.gmail.com> On 9/18/06, Curt Hibbs wrote: > > On 9/18/06, Bill Walton wrote: > > > > David Morton wrote: > > > > > Bill Walton wrote: > > >> > > >> Is 'Start with WEBrick' still going to be on the interface? Or is > > >> Mongrel going to replace both WEBrick and SCGI? > > > > > > I suppose we could have both, but with mongrel, there's really no > > > reason to use webrick; mongrel is faster and more stable. > > > > And Mongrel is port-configurable. I can't see why WEBrick is still > > needed > > either. As long as Mongrel can be run from the command line (or > > preferably > > from the button that's currently labeled 'Start with WEBrick') and > > concurrently with Apache serving a different app (e.g., phpmyadmin). > > > > > WEBirck is not really needed, and could go away. For IR 1 it might be nice > to keep as a just-in-case safety net. > > BTW, configuring the runtime mode and port effects both Mongrel *and* > WEBrick. > > Curt > Also, this is all cheked in the SVN, so any of you can check it out and try it. The only think that doesn't work yet is proxying through apache. Curt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/instantrails-developers/attachments/20060918/2eb5ea73/attachment.html From curt.hibbs at gmail.com Tue Sep 19 06:45:31 2006 From: curt.hibbs at gmail.com (Curt Hibbs) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 05:45:31 -0500 Subject: [Instantrails-developers] Should I drop WEBrick? Message-ID: <31d15f490609190345t6d139a34m94f0c87b58bba71b@mail.gmail.com> Should I drop WEBrick completely from the UI, or should I leave it as a backup to Mongrel? Curt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/instantrails-developers/attachments/20060919/dfca9a52/attachment-0001.html From tanner.burson at gmail.com Tue Sep 19 09:02:19 2006 From: tanner.burson at gmail.com (Tanner Burson) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:02:19 -0500 Subject: [Instantrails-developers] Should I drop WEBrick? In-Reply-To: <31d15f490609190345t6d139a34m94f0c87b58bba71b@mail.gmail.com> References: <31d15f490609190345t6d139a34m94f0c87b58bba71b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On 9/19/06, Curt Hibbs wrote: > > Should I drop WEBrick completely from the UI, or should I leave it as a > backup to Mongrel? > I'm all for dropping it from the GUI, it has no sufficient benifits that I'm aware of over Mongrel. But I'm willing to be convinced otherwise :) Curt > > _______________________________________________ > Instantrails-developers mailing list > Instantrails-developers at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/instantrails-developers > > -- ===Tanner Burson=== tanner.burson at gmail.com http://tannerburson.com <---Might even work one day... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/instantrails-developers/attachments/20060919/022e22d3/attachment.html From mortonda at dgrmm.net Tue Sep 19 11:07:09 2006 From: mortonda at dgrmm.net (David Morton) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:07:09 -0500 Subject: [Instantrails-developers] Should I drop WEBrick? In-Reply-To: References: <31d15f490609190345t6d139a34m94f0c87b58bba71b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4510079D.2020705@dgrmm.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tanner Burson wrote: > > On 9/19/06, *Curt Hibbs* > wrote: > > Should I drop WEBrick completely from the UI, or should I leave it > as a backup to Mongrel? > > > I'm all for dropping it from the GUI, it has no sufficient benifits that > I'm aware of over Mongrel. But I'm willing to be convinced otherwise :) I agree. If it's really important, one could always drop to a shell and run script/server. I never use webrick any more though. - -- David Morton Maia Mailguard - http://www.maiamailguard.com Morton Software Design and Consulting - http://www.dgrmm.net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFEAedUy30ODPkzl0RAv9cAJ4hPs+KsrzaTIRxc3M2hlKnMNkqfACfR4/O Vw0+VGFFWACdR75rfKW09/Q= =Z+Rn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From curt.hibbs at gmail.com Tue Sep 19 11:19:26 2006 From: curt.hibbs at gmail.com (Curt Hibbs) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:19:26 -0500 Subject: [Instantrails-developers] Should I drop WEBrick? In-Reply-To: <4510079D.2020705@dgrmm.net> References: <31d15f490609190345t6d139a34m94f0c87b58bba71b@mail.gmail.com> <4510079D.2020705@dgrmm.net> Message-ID: <31d15f490609190819k569cbb07te24907c0fd208d3c@mail.gmail.com> On 9/19/06, David Morton wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Tanner Burson wrote: > > > > On 9/19/06, *Curt Hibbs* > > wrote: > > > > Should I drop WEBrick completely from the UI, or should I leave it > > as a backup to Mongrel? > > > > > > I'm all for dropping it from the GUI, it has no sufficient benifits that > > I'm aware of over Mongrel. But I'm willing to be convinced otherwise :) > > I agree. If it's really important, one could always drop to a shell and > run > script/server. > > I never use webrick any more though. > Ok, I'm going to drop it, then. Bill, this will effect the O'Reilly tutorials you're working on. Curt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/instantrails-developers/attachments/20060919/7b1e2da0/attachment.html From curt.hibbs at gmail.com Mon Sep 25 11:49:57 2006 From: curt.hibbs at gmail.com (Curt Hibbs) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:49:57 -0500 Subject: [Instantrails-developers] Need advice on Apache 1.3 Config Message-ID: <31d15f490609250849l178a553dre9cee4dc36d53ebc@mail.gmail.com> Instant Rails 1.4 is almost ready for release. It replaces SCGI with Mongrel (when serving via Apache), and Mongrel also replaces WEBrick for serving up your app during development. This release also updates Rails and to the latest version and the embedded Ruby to 1.8.5, and it will automatically configure RadRails with the correct paths. The only thing left to do is to set up the Apache configuration to use mod_proxy to forward http requests the Rails apps being served by Mongrel. I'm not an Apache expert. With some research and experimentation I can figure this out, but I thought maybe one of you could save me a lot of time and help get this release out the door more quickly. What I need is a Virtual Host setup and possibly an Alias setup for Apache 1.3 (*not* Apache 2) that will use mod_proxy to forward requests to a Rails app being served by Mongrel on a given port. Any help/suggestions would be appreciated. Curt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/instantrails-developers/attachments/20060925/fb625e9c/attachment.html