From bill.walton at charter.net Sat Nov 4 13:09:20 2006 From: bill.walton at charter.net (Bill Walton) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 12:09:20 -0600 Subject: [Instantrails-developers] IR Install instructions update Message-ID: <02b701c7003c$5a5e0f60$6401a8c0@Presario> The new version of the "Rolling" tutorial is out for review and the biggest change to it is that that the installation instructions have been replaced with a link to the InstantRails installation instructions. I'm about to begin updating the instructions to make sure they're accurate for IR 1.4 and thought I would solicit your opinions. There are at least a couple of ways I could go. 1) update the wiki 2) update the html version that was removed from the tutorial. The upside to (2) is presentation. It's a whole lot easier to use images, etc. in the html version. We tried this with the "Rolling with Ruby on Instant Rails" tutorial, linking the html from the wiki (readers added their comments / suggestions to the wiki page) The upside to (1) is that it's less work for me ;-) Let me know what you think. Bill -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/instantrails-developers/attachments/20061104/bad567a1/attachment.html From curt.hibbs at gmail.com Sat Nov 4 13:47:11 2006 From: curt.hibbs at gmail.com (Curt Hibbs) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 12:47:11 -0600 Subject: [Instantrails-developers] IR Install instructions update In-Reply-To: <02b701c7003c$5a5e0f60$6401a8c0@Presario> References: <02b701c7003c$5a5e0f60$6401a8c0@Presario> Message-ID: <31d15f490611041047s37033e4fp1c5c8763f9561d3d@mail.gmail.com> #1 is better because it means that other peple can update it and make corrections, too. Curt On 11/4/06, Bill Walton wrote: > > The new version of the "Rolling" tutorial is out for review and > the biggest change to it is that that the installation instructions have > been replaced with a link to the InstantRails installation instructions. > > I'm about to begin updating the instructions to make sure they're accurate > for IR 1.4 and thought I would solicit your opinions. There are at least > a couple of ways I could go. > > 1) update the wiki > 2) update the html version that was removed from the tutorial. > > The upside to (2) is presentation. It's a whole lot easier to use images, > etc. in the html version. We tried this with the "Rolling with Ruby on > Instant Rails" tutorial, linking the html from the wiki (readers added their > comments / suggestions to the wiki page) > > The upside to (1) is that it's less work for me ;-) > > Let me know what you think. > > Bill > > _______________________________________________ > Instantrails-developers mailing list > Instantrails-developers at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/instantrails-developers > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/instantrails-developers/attachments/20061104/807cdd8c/attachment.html From bill.walton at charter.net Sat Nov 4 16:48:31 2006 From: bill.walton at charter.net (Bill Walton) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 15:48:31 -0600 Subject: [Instantrails-developers] IR Install instructions update References: <02b701c7003c$5a5e0f60$6401a8c0@Presario> <31d15f490611041047s37033e4fp1c5c8763f9561d3d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <032801c7005a$fc3bc2a0$6401a8c0@Presario> After a quick look at the wiki, other than updating the screen shots, I really don't see anything that needs updating. Your thoughts? ----- Original Message ----- From: Curt Hibbs To: instantrails-developers at rubyforge.org Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 12:47 PM Subject: Re: [Instantrails-developers] IR Install instructions update #1 is better because it means that other peple can update it and make corrections, too. Curt On 11/4/06, Bill Walton < bill.walton at charter.net> wrote: The new version of the "Rolling" tutorial is out for review and the biggest change to it is that that the installation instructions have been replaced with a link to the InstantRails installation instructions. I'm about to begin updating the instructions to make sure they're accurate for IR 1.4 and thought I would solicit your opinions. There are at least a couple of ways I could go. 1) update the wiki 2) update the html version that was removed from the tutorial. The upside to (2) is presentation. It's a whole lot easier to use images, etc. in the html version. We tried this with the "Rolling with Ruby on Instant Rails" tutorial, linking the html from the wiki (readers added their comments / suggestions to the wiki page) The upside to (1) is that it's less work for me ;-) Let me know what you think. Bill _______________________________________________ Instantrails-developers mailing list Instantrails-developers at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/instantrails-developers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Instantrails-developers mailing list Instantrails-developers at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/instantrails-developers -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/instantrails-developers/attachments/20061104/230254d7/attachment.html From curt.hibbs at gmail.com Tue Nov 14 11:39:03 2006 From: curt.hibbs at gmail.com (Curt Hibbs) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:39:03 -0600 Subject: [Instantrails-developers] I'm on vacation until 12-2 Message-ID: <31d15f490611140839pf8b4c89kf6987cc170b02e1f@mail.gmail.com> Just wanted to let you know that starting tomorrow I'm going to be on vacation in Thailand until 12-2. I probably won't have access to email to don't expect any answers from my until after I get back. Thanks, Curt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/instantrails-developers/attachments/20061114/05137361/attachment.html