[fxruby-users] Slow loading with Ruby 1.9.3 and FXRuby 1.6.23
allend at trimet.org
Sat Mar 17 01:10:18 UTC 2012
We have been using Ruby 1.8.6 and FXRuby 1.6.16 under Windows, from the old
one step installer.
The following code takes less than a second to load and execute on my
five-year old Windows XP PC.
With Ruby 1.9.3 and FXRuby 1.6.23, it takes 12 or more seconds. Both tests
are with all files on my local hard drive.
I understand that Ruby 1.9.x on Windows has performance problems with
'require', but I am wondering if anyone knows a workaround, and whether this
is caused by Ruby 1.9 or is related to the different compiler for FXRuby. I
have tried other Ruby 1.9.x binaries that attempt to help with 'require' but
see no performance difference for FXRuby 1.6.23.
I should add that after loading, the application itself performs just fine
with Ruby 1.9.3 and FXRuby 1.6.23.
View this message in context: http://ruby.11.n6.nabble.com/Slow-loading-with-Ruby-1-9-3-and-FXRuby-1-6-23-tp4626884p4626884.html
Sent from the FXRuby Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the fxruby-users