[fxruby-users] FXRuby docs
lyle.johnson at gmail.com
Wed Apr 11 15:20:49 EDT 2007
On 4/11/07, Joel VanderWerf <vjoel at path.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> I've noticed a few small problems when the FXRuby docs are built by ruby
> gems, rather than by hand.
> One problem is that the "Parent:" field is not correct. For example, the
> parent of FXPopup is listed as Object.
> Also, the "In:" field has some extraneous stuff:
> These problems do not happen when I run rdoc in the rdoc-sources dir.
Huh. I had never noticed this before, but you're right.
> I guess it is because rubygems runs rdoc on all .rb files, so it picks
> up things like aliases.rb, which opens classes but does not declare
> Is there any way to tell rubygems to invoke rdoc like this:
Yes, I just need to update the gem specification so that it's
consistent with the Rakefile's list of files to include (and exclude).
I've filed a bug report on this and it should be fixed the next time.
> Otherwise, the docs are great. Your work to build up the rdoc-sources
> seems to have paid off. I don't seem to need to keep the Fox docs open
> in a browser any more. In fact, the RDoc-generated html is easier to
> read and navigate than the Doxygen Fox stuff.
More information about the fxruby-users