[fxruby-users] [Q] Proposed FXRuby 1.2 Feature Name Change

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng hgs at dmu.ac.uk
Thu Jul 29 06:43:33 EDT 2004


On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Lyle Johnson wrote:

>
> On Jul 28, 2004, at 5:01 AM, Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:
>
>> I'd suggest fox1_2 to save any confusion when Fox 12.x comes out....
>
> Ugh, I recoil in horror at that underscore. Given Jeroen's conservative

:-)  Well, it is better than a space! :-)
         [...]
> I think I'll stick with "fox12".
OK.
>
>> Will you be backporting this into FXRuby 1.0 as well, as fox1_0, for
>> consistency?
>
> I don't think there's any point, at this juncture (besides which it would 
> break existing code that tries to require 'fox'). So the unadorned "fox"

I wasn't thinking of making it mandatory for current code, just
optional to be clear.

> feature name will always be associated with FXRuby 1.0.
>
         Hugh
>



More information about the fxruby-users mailing list