[fxruby-users] [Q] Proposed FXRuby 1.2 Feature Name Change

Rich Lyman fxruby at gmail.com
Wed Jul 28 20:02:01 EDT 2004


Lyle,

   I'm all for it.

   What you suggested sounds great.

   Thanks for being worried about my old applications.

-Rich


On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:19:38 -0500, Lyle Johnson <lyle at knology.net> wrote:
> 
> On Jul 28, 2004, at 9:20 AM, Yuri Leikind wrote:
> 
> > I have both 1.2.x and 1.2.x libraries installed, and I had to rename
> > this
> > stub library to be able to require the old version.
> 
> Yes, this is one of the problems I was referring to with the current
> naming situation.
> 
> > This problem wouldn't exist if this RubyGems feature were controllable
> > via RubyGems package spec file.
> 
> True, but we'd still have a name clash for people who prefer to install
> it from some other, non-RubyGems source (such as RPA).
> 
> > Maybe we should propose this feature to the RubyGems developers?
> 
> Regardless of whether we personally could take advantage of such a
> feature, I agree that it's a good idea. I can give you their e-mail
> address if you'd like. ;)
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> fxruby-users mailing list
> fxruby-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/fxruby-users
>


More information about the fxruby-users mailing list