[ditz-talk] Some work on ditz
ohad at lutzky.net
Wed Jul 30 16:23:58 EDT 2008
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:09 PM, William Morgan
<wmorgan-ditz at masanjin.net> wrote:
> Reformatted excerpts from Ohad Lutzky's message of 2008-07-29:
>> However, now I realize trollop is also yours, so it makes more sense
>> to hack on that...
> Yes, I'm generally happy to develop trollop, using ditz as a use case.
>> For now I've hacked around the issue I was having (trollop was
>> "stealing" flags from the subcommand, and stop_on couldn't be
>> specified without the hack in
>> 126f410e7ebc900f2b60abf124cda042a4e07a6c. So I figured we might want
>> to bring that hack straight into trollop - add a general
>> "stop_on_subcommand" flag which doesn't need to know what the
>> subcommand would be.
> Adding an unconditional "stop at first non-option argument" to Trollop
> is a good idea.
Will do :)
By the way - where should I do it? Trollop's repository is SVN, and I
see ditz has its own version...
> But I also think we should just remove the :plugins_file option from
> ditz. I added it on a whim, and I don't think it's useful, and since
> plugins can affect parsing, you can construct ambiguous/paradoxical
> commandlines like "ditz --plugin-file a b --plugin-file c". If a is a
> plugin file that doesn't add b as a command, then should ditz unload it
> and load c instead? What if c is a plugin file that does add b as a
> command? Should ditz simply explode in a ball of fire?
> Does anyone make use of the --plugins-file option? I could make it an
> environment variable instead.
You should also take note that some plugins should be project-wide
(such as git. Why is .ditz-plugins gitignored?), and some should be
system-wide (a plugin to make all of the commands work in a nifty
manner using vi, perhaps). I vote for dropping --plugins-file (but
still using stop at first non-option).
Any Debian users to appreciate the "super cow powers" joke around? :)
Man is the only animal that laughs and weeps, for he is the only
animal that is struck with the difference between what things are and
what they ought to be.
- William Hazlitt
More information about the ditz-talk