[ditz-talk] First impressions

Nicolas Pouillard nicolas.pouillard at gmail.com
Wed Aug 27 12:02:11 EDT 2008


Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Mon Aug 25 02:37:31 +0200 2008:
> Reformatted excerpts from nicolas.pouillard's message of 2008-08-23:
> > > Yes, when used in title, description, and comment strings. I'm not
> > > suggesting you only use a number there.
> > >
> > > I'm suggesting you allow the pound sign to be omitted in places
> > > where the number is unambiguous -- specifically, the commandline.
> > 
> > +1
> 
> Interesting. That's two in favor and one against. Any more opinions?
> 
> Informal poll:
> 
> Reply with +1 if you think it's fine for ditz to take unadorned issue
> numbers like "23" on the commandline, while requiring that you mark them
> up somehow (like "#23") when using them in a comment, or an issue title
> or description.

+1

> Reply with -1 if you think the short issue name format should be
> consistent on the commandline and within comments, issue titles and
> issue descriptions. Note that using a # is interpreted a comment in most
> shells, so it will have to be something like "@23", "i23", "+23", "^23",
> etc. Feel free to include your favorite prefix.

The i23 is also a nice choice.

-- 
Nicolas Pouillard aka Ertai
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ditz-talk/attachments/20080827/dbc50352/attachment-0001.bin>


More information about the ditz-talk mailing list