[ditz-talk] [Ditz-talk] [PATCH] Improve automatic documentation and checking of command arguments.

Nicolas Pouillard nicolas.pouillard at gmail.com
Wed Apr 9 13:29:08 EDT 2008

Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Sun Apr 06 23:32:56 +0200 2008:
> Reformatted excerpts from nicolas.pouillard's message of 2008-04-06:
> > About contributions, what do you prefer: patches in mails or merge
> > request on gitorious?
> I'm happy with either. It seems like merge requests probably make
> developers' lives easier (no need to worry about my local copy of the
> change versus its duplicate once applied in the remote repository),
> though I appreciate the immediate public review opportunities of the
> email patch.

I  prefer the email-patch approach, but as I understand it, if you don't apply
it  quickly I we will have to 'rebase' it and then loose the fact that we have
the  same  patch.  The  clone+merge-request approach seems to fix this but I'm
not  sure  you  like  the  web  based approach, perhaps a mail on mailing list
would be better.

BTW I've just made such a merge request on gitorious.

Nicolas Pouillard aka Ertai
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ditz-talk/attachments/20080409/ca5d081b/attachment.bin 

More information about the ditz-talk mailing list