[Cruisecontrolrb-users] Which Version for git support?
matt at mattwynne.net
Fri Aug 8 08:42:33 EDT 2008
Thanks Chad. I guess I'll stick with benburkert's version for the
time being then, and watch here for updates.
On 8 Aug 2008, at 12:55, Chad Woolley wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 4:01 AM, Matt Wynne <matt at mattwynne.net> wrote:
>> * There's a branch on github
>> here: http://github.com/benburkert/cruisecontrolrb/tree/master
>> which I've
>> got working with our git repo. yay!
>> * But then I saw a post from Jeremy Lightsmith very recently on
>> this list
>> pointing to the new github
>> branch: http://github.com/thoughtworks/cruisecontrol.rb
> I'll tell you what I can.
> I think that benburkert's should be changed to a branch off the new
> "official" one, but not sure if that is possible/hard on GitHub. From
> what I've heard, should be possible if all the branches are deleted?
>> So what's the git support like in the new thoughtworks github
>> repo? Should I
>> move over to that?
> I've found some bugs which I reported on Lighthouse (and tagged with
> git), and referenced in a recent thread on this list. I think
> benburkert's may be more stable, but it uses Grit, which has native
> dependencies. This has been discussed on a separate thread as well.
> Not sure of the latest status on everything, no updates on those
> -- Chad
> Cruisecontrolrb-users mailing list
> Cruisecontrolrb-users at rubyforge.org
More information about the Cruisecontrolrb-users