[Cruisecontrolrb-users] Which Version for git support?

[Matt Wynne]

Thanks Chad. I guess I'll stick with benburkert's version for the  
time being then, and watch here for updates.

cheers,
Matt

On 8 Aug 2008, at 12:55, Chad Woolley wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 4:01 AM, Matt Wynne <matt at mattwynne.net> wrote:
>> * There's a branch on github
>> here: http://github.com/benburkert/cruisecontrolrb/tree/master  
>> which I've
>> got working with our git repo. yay!
>> * But then I saw a post from Jeremy Lightsmith very recently on  
>> this list
>> (http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/cruisecontrolrb-users/2008-August/ 
>> 000560.html)
>> pointing to the new github
>> branch: http://github.com/thoughtworks/cruisecontrol.rb
>
> I'll tell you what I can.
>
> I think that benburkert's should be changed to a branch off the new
> "official" one, but not sure if that is possible/hard on GitHub.  From
> what I've heard, should be possible if all the branches are deleted?
>
>> So what's the git support like in the new thoughtworks github  
>> repo? Should I
>> move over to that?
>
> I've found some bugs which I reported on Lighthouse (and tagged with
> git), and referenced in a recent thread on this list.  I think
> benburkert's may be more stable, but it uses Grit, which has native
> dependencies.  This has been discussed on a separate thread as well.
> Not sure of the latest status on everything, no updates on those
> threads...
>
> -- Chad
> _______________________________________________
> Cruisecontrolrb-users mailing list
> Cruisecontrolrb-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-users