From siu.ying at gmail.com  Wed Jul  2 19:10:28 2008
From: siu.ying at gmail.com (Siu Ying)
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 16:10:28 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-developers] Plans to upgrade to Rails 2.1?
In-Reply-To: <3945c4270806251442j1b9a7791leffbacebfa83f398@mail.gmail.com>
References: <9c1993f20806250834p3b70c0f6jf8731a4d79900d99@mail.gmail.com>
	<e3af97510806250851o3a534540h3255a8ee36a4fc70@mail.gmail.com>
	<3945c4270806251442j1b9a7791leffbacebfa83f398@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <18248813.post@talk.nabble.com>


Perhaps compatibility with Ruby 1.8.7?


Alexey Verkhovsky-2 wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Chad Woolley <thewoolleyman at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Note, I believe Alexey is still planning to move the repository to
>> GitHub Real Soon (?).
> Yup. Real Soon :)
> 
> As for upgrading to Rails 2.1, what would we gain by doing it?
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Plans-to-upgrade-to-Rails-2.1--tp18115378p18248813.html
Sent from the CruiseControl.rb - Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


From alexey.verkhovsky at gmail.com  Wed Jul  2 19:52:51 2008
From: alexey.verkhovsky at gmail.com (Alexey Verkhovsky)
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 17:52:51 -0600
Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-developers] Plans to upgrade to Rails 2.1?
In-Reply-To: <18248813.post@talk.nabble.com>
References: <9c1993f20806250834p3b70c0f6jf8731a4d79900d99@mail.gmail.com>
	<e3af97510806250851o3a534540h3255a8ee36a4fc70@mail.gmail.com>
	<3945c4270806251442j1b9a7791leffbacebfa83f398@mail.gmail.com>
	<18248813.post@talk.nabble.com>
Message-ID: <3945c4270807021652t6dd3580q6a6093381b2ffea3@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Siu Ying <siu.ying at gmail.com> wrote:
> Perhaps compatibility with Ruby 1.8.7?

Hmm... this does sound like a good reason. 1.8.7 is not a sane Ruby
version yet, but eventually we'll have to support it.

-- 
Alexey Verkhovsky

From thewoolleyman at gmail.com  Wed Jul  2 21:28:50 2008
From: thewoolleyman at gmail.com (Chad Woolley)
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 18:28:50 -0700
Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-developers] Plans to upgrade to Rails 2.1?
In-Reply-To: <3945c4270806251442j1b9a7791leffbacebfa83f398@mail.gmail.com>
References: <mailman.162.1214407660.1550.cruisecontrolrb-developers@rubyforge.org>
	<9c1993f20806250834p3b70c0f6jf8731a4d79900d99@mail.gmail.com>
	<e3af97510806250851o3a534540h3255a8ee36a4fc70@mail.gmail.com>
	<3945c4270806251442j1b9a7791leffbacebfa83f398@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e3af97510807021828m7c19cf8bt4fcb8acfeb8b7f62@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Alexey Verkhovsky
<alexey.verkhovsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> As for upgrading to Rails 2.1, what would we gain by doing it?

I'd say easier hackability, as well.  Can't hurt to keep up with the
times and have the code be what people will be familiar with...

From alexey.verkhovsky at gmail.com  Wed Jul  2 22:51:44 2008
From: alexey.verkhovsky at gmail.com (Alexey Verkhovsky)
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 20:51:44 -0600
Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-developers] Plans to upgrade to Rails 2.1?
In-Reply-To: <e3af97510807021828m7c19cf8bt4fcb8acfeb8b7f62@mail.gmail.com>
References: <mailman.162.1214407660.1550.cruisecontrolrb-developers@rubyforge.org>
	<9c1993f20806250834p3b70c0f6jf8731a4d79900d99@mail.gmail.com>
	<e3af97510806250851o3a534540h3255a8ee36a4fc70@mail.gmail.com>
	<3945c4270806251442j1b9a7791leffbacebfa83f398@mail.gmail.com>
	<e3af97510807021828m7c19cf8bt4fcb8acfeb8b7f62@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3945c4270807021951s50617b5cjf214f149c4c8fb00@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Chad Woolley <thewoolleyman at gmail.com> wrote:
>> As for upgrading to Rails 2.1, what would we gain by doing it?
> I'd say easier hackability, as well.  Can't hurt to keep up with the
> times and have the code be what people will be familiar with...

Having thought about it for a bit, I'd say we should maybe port it to
Merb instead :) Smaller memory footprint, and it's similar enough to
Rails that hackability wont suffer too much.

-- 
Alexey Verkhovsky

From jeremy.lightsmith at gmail.com  Thu Jul  3 14:19:18 2008
From: jeremy.lightsmith at gmail.com (Jeremy Lightsmith)
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 12:19:18 -0600
Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-developers] Plans to upgrade to Rails 2.1?
In-Reply-To: <3945c4270807021951s50617b5cjf214f149c4c8fb00@mail.gmail.com>
References: <mailman.162.1214407660.1550.cruisecontrolrb-developers@rubyforge.org>
	<9c1993f20806250834p3b70c0f6jf8731a4d79900d99@mail.gmail.com>
	<e3af97510806250851o3a534540h3255a8ee36a4fc70@mail.gmail.com>
	<3945c4270806251442j1b9a7791leffbacebfa83f398@mail.gmail.com>
	<e3af97510807021828m7c19cf8bt4fcb8acfeb8b7f62@mail.gmail.com>
	<3945c4270807021951s50617b5cjf214f149c4c8fb00@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <648eacf20807031119p4a9c7273l37ae45487e2f278d@mail.gmail.com>

I'd second that - our builders are WAY to big and bulky for what they do,
and I think merb could significantly help with that.

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Alexey Verkhovsky <
alexey.verkhovsky at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Chad Woolley <thewoolleyman at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> As for upgrading to Rails 2.1, what would we gain by doing it?
> > I'd say easier hackability, as well.  Can't hurt to keep up with the
> > times and have the code be what people will be familiar with...
>
> Having thought about it for a bit, I'd say we should maybe port it to
> Merb instead :) Smaller memory footprint, and it's similar enough to
> Rails that hackability wont suffer too much.
>
> --
> Alexey Verkhovsky
> _______________________________________________
> Cruisecontrolrb-developers mailing list
> Cruisecontrolrb-developers at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-developers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/cruisecontrolrb-developers/attachments/20080703/08a18eab/attachment.html>

From thewoolleyman at gmail.com  Thu Jul  3 15:06:47 2008
From: thewoolleyman at gmail.com (Chad Woolley)
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 12:06:47 -0700
Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-developers] Plans to upgrade to Rails 2.1?
In-Reply-To: <3945c4270807021951s50617b5cjf214f149c4c8fb00@mail.gmail.com>
References: <mailman.162.1214407660.1550.cruisecontrolrb-developers@rubyforge.org>
	<9c1993f20806250834p3b70c0f6jf8731a4d79900d99@mail.gmail.com>
	<e3af97510806250851o3a534540h3255a8ee36a4fc70@mail.gmail.com>
	<3945c4270806251442j1b9a7791leffbacebfa83f398@mail.gmail.com>
	<e3af97510807021828m7c19cf8bt4fcb8acfeb8b7f62@mail.gmail.com>
	<3945c4270807021951s50617b5cjf214f149c4c8fb00@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e3af97510807031206m10959484w7803caeb28f0fcc5@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Alexey Verkhovsky
<alexey.verkhovsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> Having thought about it for a bit, I'd say we should maybe port it to
> Merb instead :) Smaller memory footprint, and it's similar enough to
> Rails that hackability wont suffer too much.

I think that is a great idea.  How would you approach it?  Maybe we
can start from scratch on a clean slate GitHub project, and begin
porting the functional tests to TDD the equivalent Merb features into
existence?  Are there any integration-type tests (Selenium, etc?) in
existence anywhere?

From alexey.verkhovsky at gmail.com  Thu Jul  3 18:26:07 2008
From: alexey.verkhovsky at gmail.com (Alexey Verkhovsky)
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 16:26:07 -0600
Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-developers] Plans to upgrade to Rails 2.1?
In-Reply-To: <e3af97510807031206m10959484w7803caeb28f0fcc5@mail.gmail.com>
References: <mailman.162.1214407660.1550.cruisecontrolrb-developers@rubyforge.org>
	<9c1993f20806250834p3b70c0f6jf8731a4d79900d99@mail.gmail.com>
	<e3af97510806250851o3a534540h3255a8ee36a4fc70@mail.gmail.com>
	<3945c4270806251442j1b9a7791leffbacebfa83f398@mail.gmail.com>
	<e3af97510807021828m7c19cf8bt4fcb8acfeb8b7f62@mail.gmail.com>
	<3945c4270807021951s50617b5cjf214f149c4c8fb00@mail.gmail.com>
	<e3af97510807031206m10959484w7803caeb28f0fcc5@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3945c4270807031526y6a2688a9gc60d818dc0729613@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Chad Woolley <thewoolleyman at gmail.com> wrote:
> How would you approach it?

We plan to spike it this Saturday.

-- 
Alex

From thewoolleyman at gmail.com  Fri Jul 18 22:38:21 2008
From: thewoolleyman at gmail.com (Chad Woolley)
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:38:21 -0700
Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-developers] Fwd: Improved daemon/init script (was
	Re: Request for examples of ccrb daemon/init script)
In-Reply-To: <e3af97510807181934p5812c73ge70c9d22c012f48a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <e3af97510807181934p5812c73ge70c9d22c012f48a@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e3af97510807181938m53875762q48f1c1612f9df1d@mail.gmail.com>

(oops guess this should have gone to dev list, reply to this one instead...)

OK, here is my attempt at improving the init script:

http://github.com/thewoolleyman/cruisecontrolrb/tree/better-daemon

And details of improvements are on the ticket:

http://cruisecontrolrb.lighthouseapp.com/projects/9150-cruise-control-rb/tickets/200-better-daemon-init-script

Thanks,
-- Chad

From nate at natemurray.com  Mon Jul 21 12:58:43 2008
From: nate at natemurray.com (Nate Murray)
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:58:43 -0700
Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-developers] Plans to upgrade to Rails 2.1?
In-Reply-To: <3945c4270807031526y6a2688a9gc60d818dc0729613@mail.gmail.com>
References: <mailman.162.1214407660.1550.cruisecontrolrb-developers@rubyforge.org>
	<9c1993f20806250834p3b70c0f6jf8731a4d79900d99@mail.gmail.com>
	<e3af97510806250851o3a534540h3255a8ee36a4fc70@mail.gmail.com>
	<3945c4270806251442j1b9a7791leffbacebfa83f398@mail.gmail.com>
	<e3af97510807021828m7c19cf8bt4fcb8acfeb8b7f62@mail.gmail.com>
	<3945c4270807021951s50617b5cjf214f149c4c8fb00@mail.gmail.com>
	<e3af97510807031206m10959484w7803caeb28f0fcc5@mail.gmail.com>
	<3945c4270807031526y6a2688a9gc60d818dc0729613@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <9c1993f20807210958n2a0f0960p59f4c1c9bcd2d3e9@mail.gmail.com>

Hey guys, I'm curious about the state of the Merb fork of cruisecontrol.

1) Did this happen? If so where is the canonical git repo? I'm guessing
github, but which one?
2) Is this the "official" plan to move forward with this? Sorry, I'm not
sure who the core developers of cruisecontrol.rb are. I'm just curious if
the Merb fork is the hobby of a few or the vision of the future.

I ask all of this because I'd like to do some cruisecontrol hacking (more
plugins, iphone interface etc) and I'd just like to know the best place to
focus my efforts.

Thanks!

Nathan Murray
Software Developer

CPO Commerce, Inc.
120 W. Bellevue Drive, Suite 300
Pasadena, CA 91105
http://cpooutlets.com/

t: 626.585.3600 x236
f: 626.585.3555

On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Alexey Verkhovsky <
alexey.verkhovsky at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Chad Woolley <thewoolleyman at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > How would you approach it?
>
> We plan to spike it this Saturday.
>
> --
> Alex
> _______________________________________________
> Cruisecontrolrb-developers mailing list
> Cruisecontrolrb-developers at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-developers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/cruisecontrolrb-developers/attachments/20080721/1c8aafa2/attachment-0001.html>

From jeremy.lightsmith at gmail.com  Mon Jul 21 13:02:20 2008
From: jeremy.lightsmith at gmail.com (Jeremy Lightsmith)
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:02:20 -0700
Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-developers] Plans to upgrade to Rails 2.1?
In-Reply-To: <9c1993f20807210958n2a0f0960p59f4c1c9bcd2d3e9@mail.gmail.com>
References: <mailman.162.1214407660.1550.cruisecontrolrb-developers@rubyforge.org>
	<9c1993f20806250834p3b70c0f6jf8731a4d79900d99@mail.gmail.com>
	<e3af97510806250851o3a534540h3255a8ee36a4fc70@mail.gmail.com>
	<3945c4270806251442j1b9a7791leffbacebfa83f398@mail.gmail.com>
	<e3af97510807021828m7c19cf8bt4fcb8acfeb8b7f62@mail.gmail.com>
	<3945c4270807021951s50617b5cjf214f149c4c8fb00@mail.gmail.com>
	<e3af97510807031206m10959484w7803caeb28f0fcc5@mail.gmail.com>
	<3945c4270807031526y6a2688a9gc60d818dc0729613@mail.gmail.com>
	<9c1993f20807210958n2a0f0960p59f4c1c9bcd2d3e9@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <648eacf20807211002u6bb3210fo96604635cebbbb4c@mail.gmail.com>

Alexey and I are the two main developers, though we often have help from
others.  The current plan is to move to merb, and also to github.  Alexey
will have to tell you what the status is currently.

Jeremy

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Nate Murray <nate at natemurray.com> wrote:

> Hey guys, I'm curious about the state of the Merb fork of cruisecontrol.
>
> 1) Did this happen? If so where is the canonical git repo? I'm guessing
> github, but which one?
> 2) Is this the "official" plan to move forward with this? Sorry, I'm not
> sure who the core developers of cruisecontrol.rb are. I'm just curious if
> the Merb fork is the hobby of a few or the vision of the future.
>
> I ask all of this because I'd like to do some cruisecontrol hacking (more
> plugins, iphone interface etc) and I'd just like to know the best place to
> focus my efforts.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Nathan Murray
> Software Developer
>
> CPO Commerce, Inc.
> 120 W. Bellevue Drive, Suite 300
> Pasadena, CA 91105
> http://cpooutlets.com/
>
> t: 626.585.3600 x236
> f: 626.585.3555
>
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Alexey Verkhovsky <
> alexey.verkhovsky at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Chad Woolley <thewoolleyman at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > How would you approach it?
>>
>> We plan to spike it this Saturday.
>>
>> --
>> Alex
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cruisecontrolrb-developers mailing list
>> Cruisecontrolrb-developers at rubyforge.org
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-developers
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cruisecontrolrb-developers mailing list
> Cruisecontrolrb-developers at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-developers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/cruisecontrolrb-developers/attachments/20080721/a70b9b16/attachment.html>

From alexey.verkhovsky at gmail.com  Mon Jul 21 14:13:35 2008
From: alexey.verkhovsky at gmail.com (Alexey Verkhovsky)
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:13:35 -0600
Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-developers] Plans to upgrade to Rails 2.1?
In-Reply-To: <648eacf20807211002u6bb3210fo96604635cebbbb4c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <mailman.162.1214407660.1550.cruisecontrolrb-developers@rubyforge.org>
	<9c1993f20806250834p3b70c0f6jf8731a4d79900d99@mail.gmail.com>
	<e3af97510806250851o3a534540h3255a8ee36a4fc70@mail.gmail.com>
	<3945c4270806251442j1b9a7791leffbacebfa83f398@mail.gmail.com>
	<e3af97510807021828m7c19cf8bt4fcb8acfeb8b7f62@mail.gmail.com>
	<3945c4270807021951s50617b5cjf214f149c4c8fb00@mail.gmail.com>
	<e3af97510807031206m10959484w7803caeb28f0fcc5@mail.gmail.com>
	<3945c4270807031526y6a2688a9gc60d818dc0729613@mail.gmail.com>
	<9c1993f20807210958n2a0f0960p59f4c1c9bcd2d3e9@mail.gmail.com>
	<648eacf20807211002u6bb3210fo96604635cebbbb4c@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3945c4270807211113i7eb9d545n83486bc874558aed@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Jeremy Lightsmith
<jeremy.lightsmith at gmail.com> wrote:
> Alexey will have to tell you what the status [of Merb port] is currently.
Been spiking it out last week, and will continue doing so tomorrow.
It's nowhere near done, we are not even sure if it's a good idea yet.
:)

-- 
Alex

From thewoolleyman at gmail.com  Mon Jul 21 21:18:04 2008
From: thewoolleyman at gmail.com (Chad Woolley)
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:18:04 -0700
Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-developers] Git problems
Message-ID: <e3af97510807211818t5d923b3fp92a0c8377fc6998d@mail.gmail.com>

I've been trying out the Git support, and there's a few problems.  I
opened tickets and tagged with 'git':

http://cruisecontrolrb.lighthouseapp.com/projects/9150-cruise-control-rb/tickets?q=tagged%3Agit

Thanks,
-- Chad