From his2000x at gmail.com  Fri Feb  5 04:59:42 2010
From: his2000x at gmail.com (in-seok hwang)
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 18:59:42 +0900
Subject: I want to use camping 2.0
Message-ID: <da31d7191002050159t1865cd59s42898e6f91ebd8d5@mail.gmail.com>

Hi ,all

I want some advice about upgrade camping version.

My server used camping-1.5.180  and mongrel-1.1.5, activerecord-2.1.1,
markaby-0.5

But, that is very old .

So , i tried to update camping version ( 1.5.180 -> 1.9.300) and i has many
problem.

two version are so different.

so i had to give up was updated.

Now i would like to try the update again.(camping 2.0)

i have two question.

what is the difference between the two version ( 1.5.180 and 2.0) ?

new version(2.0) of the old version ( 1.5.180) of the website should create
a new one?
Some small modifications to the source is not possible to update do?

plz give me hint.

My English is not enough.
Sorry.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/camping-list/attachments/20100205/7bb3f286/attachment.html>

From deveritt at innotts.co.uk  Fri Feb  5 05:17:04 2010
From: deveritt at innotts.co.uk (Dave Everitt)
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:17:04 +0000
Subject: I want to use camping 2.0
In-Reply-To: <da31d7191002050159t1865cd59s42898e6f91ebd8d5@mail.gmail.com>
References: <da31d7191002050159t1865cd59s42898e6f91ebd8d5@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <044BFEE8-5E5D-44AA-BE32-E1348F1EBB2B@innotts.co.uk>

Hi - take a look here:

http://stuff.judofyr.net/camping-docs/book/51_upgrading.html#from-15- 
to-20

DaveE

> what is the difference between the two version ( 1.5.180 and 2.0) ?


From dsusco at gmail.com  Fri Feb 19 14:59:57 2010
From: dsusco at gmail.com (David Susco)
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:59:57 -0500
Subject: going into production, a few questions
Message-ID: <1bd79b4a1002191159xefe14f0tcdb82bb33a092b7a@mail.gmail.com>

I have a few camping projects that are about to go into production in
a few weeks, just picking your brains to see if I can add some
robustness.

What's the best way to catch any "Camping Problem! /XXX not found"
errors that a user might see if they start typing URLs themselves?
Ideally I'd just like to redirect them all to some general index
controller.

I'm using MySQL for my database. I'm getting a few "MySQL server has
gone away" error messages every now and then. I did some searching and
found if "reconnect: true" is in the hash I send to
establish_connection that I should be all set. Can anyone confirm?
Also, any other MySQL connection "best practices" that I should be
following?

-- 
Dave

From judofyr at gmail.com  Fri Feb 19 15:13:06 2010
From: judofyr at gmail.com (Magnus Holm)
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:13:06 +0100
Subject: going into production, a few questions
In-Reply-To: <1bd79b4a1002191159xefe14f0tcdb82bb33a092b7a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1bd79b4a1002191159xefe14f0tcdb82bb33a092b7a@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <391a49da1002191213v4c691b0bofac48eb1ba5ef319@mail.gmail.com>

404 on 1.5:
module App::Controllers
  class NotFound
    def get(path)
      "Do something with path"
    end
  end
end

404 on 1.9/2.0:
module App
  def r404(path)
    "Do something with path"
  end
end

There appears to be two solutions:
Call ActiveRecord::Base.verify_active_connections! before every request (I
think this is what Rails does by default):

module VerifyConnection
  def service(*args)
    ActiveRecord::Base.verify_active_connections!
  ensure
    return super
  end
end

module App
  include VerifyConnection
end

Or, pass reconnect => true to establish_connection.

I'm not quite sure what's best?

// Magnus Holm


On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 20:59, David Susco <dsusco at gmail.com> wrote:

> I have a few camping projects that are about to go into production in
> a few weeks, just picking your brains to see if I can add some
> robustness.
>
> What's the best way to catch any "Camping Problem! /XXX not found"
> errors that a user might see if they start typing URLs themselves?
> Ideally I'd just like to redirect them all to some general index
> controller.
>
> I'm using MySQL for my database. I'm getting a few "MySQL server has
> gone away" error messages every now and then. I did some searching and
> found if "reconnect: true" is in the hash I send to
> establish_connection that I should be all set. Can anyone confirm?
> Also, any other MySQL connection "best practices" that I should be
> following?
>
> --
> Dave
> _______________________________________________
> Camping-list mailing list
> Camping-list at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/camping-list/attachments/20100219/b11a7771/attachment.html>

From dsusco at gmail.com  Fri Feb 19 15:51:07 2010
From: dsusco at gmail.com (David Susco)
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:51:07 -0500
Subject: going into production, a few questions
In-Reply-To: <391a49da1002191213v4c691b0bofac48eb1ba5ef319@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1bd79b4a1002191159xefe14f0tcdb82bb33a092b7a@mail.gmail.com>
	<391a49da1002191213v4c691b0bofac48eb1ba5ef319@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1bd79b4a1002191251j13bb5376x8eaf373587a5bc6@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks on the 404 stuff, that was easy.

I'm going to stick with the reconnect => true until that is proving
not to work. It's the easiest as it's a one liner addition to my yaml.

Dave

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Magnus Holm <judofyr at gmail.com> wrote:
> 404 on 1.5:
> module App::Controllers
> ??class NotFound
> ?? ?def get(path)
> ?? ? ?"Do something with path"
> ?? ?end
> ??end
> end
> 404 on 1.9/2.0:
> module App
> ??def r404(path)
> ?? ?"Do something with path"
> ??end
> end
> There appears to be two solutions:
> Call?ActiveRecord::Base.verify_active_connections! before every request (I
> think this is what Rails does by default):
> module VerifyConnection
> ??def service(*args)
> ?? ?ActiveRecord::Base.verify_active_connections!
> ??ensure
> ?? ?return super
> ??end
> end
> module App
> ??include VerifyConnection
> end
> Or, pass reconnect => true to establish_connection.
> I'm not quite sure what's best?
> // Magnus Holm
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 20:59, David Susco <dsusco at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I have a few camping projects that are about to go into production in
>> a few weeks, just picking your brains to see if I can add some
>> robustness.
>>
>> What's the best way to catch any "Camping Problem! /XXX not found"
>> errors that a user might see if they start typing URLs themselves?
>> Ideally I'd just like to redirect them all to some general index
>> controller.
>>
>> I'm using MySQL for my database. I'm getting a few "MySQL server has
>> gone away" error messages every now and then. I did some searching and
>> found if "reconnect: true" is in the hash I send to
>> establish_connection that I should be all set. Can anyone confirm?
>> Also, any other MySQL connection "best practices" that I should be
>> following?
>>
>> --
>> Dave
>> _______________________________________________
>> Camping-list mailing list
>> Camping-list at rubyforge.org
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Camping-list mailing list
> Camping-list at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
>



-- 
Dave