Camping 2.0 - What's left?
anibalrojas at gmail.com
Mon May 26 10:26:26 EDT 2008
Me neither ;-) And talking about instructions, the Wiki will need a
Extreme Make Over to catch up with the code.
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Bluebie, Jenna
<blueberry at creativepony.com> wrote:
> Yeah, I suppose that's reasonable.. the timestamp even on The Camping Server
> and stuff would still be unique to the system.. it's a short secret, but
> it's better than nothing. Warnings and defaulting to that sounds like a good
> idea to me!
> I beg to differ on those who don't follow instructions and don't listen to
> warnings being beyond help. There should be a good default. :)
> I frequently don't follow instructions!
> On 26/05/2008, at 2:45 PM, _why wrote:
>> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 08:56:38PM +1930, Aníbal Rojas wrote:
>>> Yes, but the idea is using this as default, and warning about it.
>> Then your idea of using `pwd` is pretty good, since it's not
>> immediately obvious. Or the timestamp of $0 might be good. If the
>> timestamp (or the path) changes, then the sessions merely expire.
>> I guess that's good enough with the warnings there, too.
>> Camping-list mailing list
>> Camping-list at rubyforge.org
> Camping-list mailing list
> Camping-list at rubyforge.org
More information about the Camping-list