Camping 2.0 - What's left?

[Magnus Holm]

On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Julian Tarkhanov
<julian.tarkhanov at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 25 mei 2008, at 00:25, Magnus Holm wrote:
>
>> * <insert your wish>
>
> * Are deeply nested query arguments and tricky bits like checkbox
> arrays/param arrays handled properly (and in a Camping-compatible manner,
> AFAIK in Camping
> the first parameter wins as opposed to Rails) by Rack?

Rack doesn't do anything special with queries ending in [] and [key], so we're
cleaning it up in Base#initialize.

It works with arrays and hashes, but not perfectly when they're nested. Could
you write some examples of how they should be handled? Here's a helper to see
what Camping does today: http://pastie.caboo.se/private/53towf4gox3di0k6c8zhw

I think we could use almost the same code if we just move it out to a helper
and do some recursive magic.

>What happens with file uploads?

No idea! Maybe Christian Neukirchen can answer what Rack::Request does with
it? There isn't any file-upload specific code in Camping now.

> * I loved Camping::H too much, don't see a big deal in wrappint the
> request/env hashes into it (also to avoid substantial code scavenging)

It would be easier to remove Camping::H for good, but I like #method_missing
for getting out the values... Unless we want to get it under the 3kB-mark, I
don't think it's worth to remove it. We're far away from 4kB!

> _______________________________________________
> Camping-list mailing list
> Camping-list at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
>

-- 
Magnus Holm