[Brug-talk] Technical question - spinoff

[Frank Louwers]

On 11 Oct 2007, at 12:46, Koen Van der Auwera wrote:

+1 (remembering to hit reply-all, and dragging brug-talk (which ends  
up in Cc: by default) to To: and removing the address that was in To)  
is too much of a hassle!)

> +1 I had the same problem yesterday! (and now again :))
>
> Koen Van der Auwera
> 10to1
>
> On 10/11/07, Jan De Poorter < brug at defv.be> wrote:
> Alain Ravet wrote:
> >   On 10/11/07, Bernard Grymonpon < bernard at openminds.be> wrote:
> >   >
> >   > On 11 Oct 2007, at 10:38, Tom Klaasen wrote:
> >   >
> >   > > (BTW, I sent this to Hans only previously by accident; is  
> there a
> >   > > way to have the reply-to header point to the list?)
> >   > >
> >   >
> >   > Hear hear!
> >
> > +1 for reseting the reply-to to its old default: the list.
> >
> +1 from here too, I almost replyed to Alain again.
>
> regards,
> Jan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Brug-talk mailing list
> Brug-talk at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/brug-talk
>
> _______________________________________________
> Brug-talk mailing list
> Brug-talk at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/brug-talk

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/brug-talk/attachments/20071011/4bdbdfd0/attachment.html