[Brug-talk] Setup BRUG website

[Frank Louwers]

On 09 Oct 2007, at 17:46, Frank Louwers wrote:

>
> On 09 Oct 2007, at 17:27, Peter Vanbroekhoven wrote:
>
>> Peter Vandenabeele wrote:
>>> Just some loose ideas (nto good as such, but can trigger other
>>> (better) ideas):
>>>
>>> * I think that domains with a - are less good
>>> * RubyBelgium.be ???
>>> * Rubium.be ???
>>> * rubug.be ???
>>> * rubyug.be ???
>>>
>>> * usergroup.ruby.be  ???
>>> * brug.ruby.be  ???
>>>   (only if the owner of ruby.be wants commit to yield this
>>>    subdomain permanently and irrevocably to this usergroup ?)
>>
>> First of all, I would prefer a domain name that has the name of the
>> user
>> group in it. This is for instant recognition, but also to
>> differentiate
>> from other user groups that may emerge in the future even though  
>> maybe
>> we hope that won't happen. Currently, the name is BRUG. We could  
>> still
>> change it, though it has seeped into a lot of places already, like  
>> the
>> mailing list names, the Rubyforge project, announcements, ... It
>> can be
>> a subdomain of a domain that does not mention a user group at all,
>> just
>> Ruby.
>>
>
> I happen to know the licensee of the brug.be domain. I'll check with
> him what his plans for this domain are and if he is willing to donate
> it to us.
>

This is the reply I got from the current owner:

---
Geen probleem, dit mag zeker gebruikt worden door de BRUG.
Twee voorwaarden:
- Wij blijven eigenaar.
- Tekstlink op de site naar Netlash?
---

Translated: No problem, can be used by BRUG, but 2 conditions:
- they remain the owner
- the want a textlink from the homepage of the site to their site

F
>


> Frank
> _______________________________________________
> Brug-talk mailing list
> Brug-talk at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/brug-talk