[Borges-users] Wee vs. Borges and continuations
Michael Neumann
mneumann at ntecs.de
Tue Sep 27 09:33:47 EDT 2005
Hi Mike,
Mike Pence wrote:
> Hello all. Can someone give me the birds-eye view of the state of
> Borges and of Wee? Aside from RDocs, Wee does not seem to be under any
> active attention or use.
>
> Does the inability to serialize continuations in Ruby affect Borges,
> and is Borges being actively developed. Is Borges stable? Is anyone
> here?
>
> I am looking for a Seaside inspired framework that is better than
> Rails at abstracting the webishness of applications.
Wee is not much in use, that's right. I know a few people (including
me), that tried it out and/or are developing application with it. I
myself, switched from Wee to Rails for a very database-centric
application, due to the statelessness of Rails (or Nitro). In
Wee/Borges, you normally spend more time in looking to find the right
abstractions, which leads to cleaner code IMHO, unless you have a very
near deadline to match of course ;-)
I haven't used continuations in Wee for a very long time. So, it might
be even the case, that I broke something (should be very easy to fix of
course).
Regards,
Michael
More information about the Borges-users
mailing list