[Borges-users] Wee vs. Borges and continuations

[Michael Neumann]

Kaspar Schiess wrote:
> Hello Mike,

Hi Kaspar and Mike,

> The birds-eye view:
> To me it looks as though Wee has some nice ideas, but borges has more
> in the way of usability and precoded components to make typical tasks
> easier. Borges is under active developement, only that it has stalled
> a bit, since it has a lot of the things one would wish for.

My development in Wee has also stalled a bit, due to lack of supporting 
people. I only develop as much as I need.

> My personal interests are currently on Ruby core hacking, and since
> you mention serializable continuations, yes, that would be really nice
> for Borges. But Borges really works without that, only that it uses
> quite a bit of memory. That's the only thing that might make you
> reconsider the use of borges. AFAIK, Wee with CC suffers from the same
> problem.

Yes, I think so.

> And yes, I am here, and I am still developing projects with borges, so
> I will react to questions, if only with some delay. And if I can do my
> part in making the web less webby, I will.
> 
> Good fun exploring borges (and/or Wee) and welcome !

You're all welcome ;-)

Regards,

   Michael