[Borges-users] cgi-lib

[Michael Neumann]

James Megquier wrote:
>> (I'm also a trifle concerned that there's no credible Borges traffic at
>> all following May of 2004.  I hope this framework isn't six months dead.)
> 
> 
> Not sure about the level of activity on Borges, but if you're interested 
> in continuation-based web frameworks like Borges and Seaside, you may 
> want to check out "Wee" for Ruby as well -- it's a relatively recent 
> stab at the idea.  You can find it on rubygems, and the homepage is here:
> 
> http://www.ntecs.de/blog/Blog/WeeFramework.rdoc

Since then, Wee has changed a lot.

You might take a look at the documentation here:

http://www.ntecs.de/viewcvs/viewcvs/*checkout*/Wee/trunk/doc/rdoc/index.html

Compared to Borges, Wee has

   * the decoration approach of the newest version of Seaside2
   * a different HtmlRenderer (with Brushes and Canvas), which is more
     extensible
   * optional continuations

And don't forget Nemo, a Mewa port to Ruby:

   http://rubyforge.org/nemo

If you like screenshots, look here:

   http://ntecs.de/blog/Wee/Screenshots.rdoc

I consider Wee as pretty stable (I've not encountered any problems), 
except the continuation problem. Therefore I recommend to not use 
continuations.

Regards,

   Michael