[Borges-users] refactoring

[Eric Hodel]

wilkes joiner (wilkesjoiner at gmail.com) wrote:

> On Sun, 2 May 2004 20:35:10 -0500, wilkes joiner <wilkesjoiner at gmail.com> wrote:
> > By the way, that it is one thing that makes reading the Borges code
> > difficult.  Methods seemed to be semi-randomly placed through out the
> > classes.  Is this a result of the smalltalk to ruby translation?  Is
> > this something that you guys think is worth cleaning up?  This could
> > just be a perception from lack of familiarity with the code base.
> 
> Duh, they are alphabetized.

Yeah, that's how they came over from Smalltalk.  It would make sense to
group them by functional group, it can make things rather difficult.

-- 
Eric Hodel - drbrain at segment7.net - http://segment7.net
All messages signed with fingerprint:
FEC2 57F1 D465 EB15 5D6E  7C11 332A 551C 796C 9F04

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/borges-users/attachments/20040502/bfbcbb31/attachment.bin