From alan_kt_wong at yahoo.com Wed Jul 2 22:38:47 2008 From: alan_kt_wong at yahoo.com (Alan Wong) Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 19:38:47 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Betternestedset-talk] add migration Message-ID: <280796.52706.qm@web53603.mail.re2.yahoo.com> I'm trying to use the better nested set plugin for the Category model for my CMS application. Since I want to start on the right foot, my Category model will act as a nested set. I do all the standard Rails generation work. I generate a model called Category. Modify a create_categories migration to create a table. Add validation logic to my Category model. Finally I am trying to prepopulate my database with data. I'm having trouble with the last step, as migrations seems to reject the method, 'move_to_child_of' newborn = Category.new(:name =>"new") newborn.save newborn.move_to_child_of root A few questions 1) Does better_nested_set require that I already have acts_as_nested_set installed for me to use it? 2) Why can't I run better_nested_set methods from migrations? BTW, I'm using Rails 2 and Ruby 1.8 Regards, Alan From cnk at caltech.edu Thu Jul 3 02:57:18 2008 From: cnk at caltech.edu (Cynthia Kiser) Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 23:57:18 -0700 Subject: [Betternestedset-talk] add migration In-Reply-To: <280796.52706.qm@web53603.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <280796.52706.qm@web53603.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20080703065718.GC3594@blinky.caltech.edu> Quoting Alan Wong : > I'm trying to use the better nested set plugin for the Category model for my CMS application. > > Since I want to start on the right foot, my Category model will act as a nested set. > I do all the standard Rails generation work. I generate a model called Category. Modify > a create_categories migration to create a table. Add validation logic to my Category model. > Finally I am trying to prepopulate my database with data. > > I'm having trouble with the last step, as migrations seems to reject the method, 'move_to_child_of' > > newborn = Category.new(:name =>"new") > newborn.save > newborn.move_to_child_of root > > A few questions > 1) Does better_nested_set require that I already have acts_as_nested_set installed for me to use it? > > 2) Why can't I run better_nested_set methods from migrations? > > BTW, I'm using Rails 2 and Ruby 1.8 Not clear what you are asking in #1 but #2 is probably that the migration doen't know Category is defined as a nested set. If you have already added the 'acts_as_nested_set' incantation to your model file before trying to run you migration the first time, then try the trick of defining the class within your migration file - after create the table but before you want to populate it. same issue (I think), different manifestation: http://blog.8thlight.com/articles/2008/06/14/active-record-migration-dependancies From jc.michel at symetrie.com Thu Jul 3 03:50:30 2008 From: jc.michel at symetrie.com (Jean-Christophe Michel) Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 09:50:30 +0200 Subject: [Betternestedset-talk] add migration In-Reply-To: <20080703065718.GC3594@blinky.caltech.edu> References: <280796.52706.qm@web53603.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <20080703065718.GC3594@blinky.caltech.edu> Message-ID: <8645F24F-AC98-4634-8AD5-2ADA8E93DD75@symetrie.com> Hi, > Quoting Alan Wong : >> 1) Does better_nested_set require that I already have >> acts_as_nested_set installed for me to use it? I second Cynthia advice. I often include the model in the migration, like this: class CreateCategs < ActiveRecord::Migration require "app/models/category.rb" def self.up ... Jean-Christophe Michel -- symetrie.com Better Nested Set for rails: http://opensource.symetrie.com/trac/better_nested_set From alan_kt_wong at yahoo.com Thu Jul 3 11:20:50 2008 From: alan_kt_wong at yahoo.com (Alan Wong) Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 08:20:50 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Betternestedset-talk] add migration Message-ID: <804810.84530.qm@web53608.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Cynthia, Thanks. I'll try to require my model from my data migration. To clarify my first question: the documentation on better_nested_set says that "This plugin provides an enhanced acts_as_nested_set mixin for ActiveRecord, the object-db mapping layer of the framework RubyOnRails." Since a 'mixin' is adding behavior dynamically to a certain class, is better_nested_set adding its enhancements directly to ActiveRecord or to acts_as_nested_set? In the latter case, I would expect my plugin directory to need BOTH acts_as_nested_set and better_nested_set, because better_nested_set decorates acts_as_nested_set which decorates ActiveRecord. The decorator semantics would not be transitive. In the former case, I would expect to simply use better_nested_set from my app's vendor/plugin directory, and add the 'acts_as_nested_set' incantation to my models. Here the decorator semantics would be transitive. Regards, Alan ----- Original Message ---- From: Cynthia Kiser To: Alan Wong ; betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2008 2:57:18 AM Subject: Re: [Betternestedset-talk] add migration Quoting Alan Wong : > I'm trying to use the better nested set plugin for the Category model for my CMS application. > > Since I want to start on the right foot, my Category model will act as a nested set. > I do all the standard Rails generation work. I generate a model called Category. Modify > a create_categories migration to create a table. Add validation logic to my Category model. > Finally I am trying to prepopulate my database with data. > > I'm having trouble with the last step, as migrations seems to reject the method, 'move_to_child_of' > > newborn = Category.new(:name =>"new") > newborn.save > newborn.move_to_child_of root > > A few questions > 1) Does better_nested_set require that I already have acts_as_nested_set installed for me to use it? > > 2) Why can't I run better_nested_set methods from migrations? > > BTW, I'm using Rails 2 and Ruby 1.8 Not clear what you are asking in #1 but #2 is probably that the migration doen't know Category is defined as a nested set. If you have already added the 'acts_as_nested_set' incantation to your model file before trying to run you migration the first time, then try the trick of defining the class within your migration file - after create the table but before you want to populate it. same issue (I think), different manifestation: http://blog.8thlight.com/articles/2008/06/14/active-record-migration-dependancies _______________________________________________ Betternestedset-talk mailing list Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk From tony.hillerson at gmail.com Tue Jul 8 17:50:18 2008 From: tony.hillerson at gmail.com (Tony Hillerson) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 15:50:18 -0600 Subject: [Betternestedset-talk] Better Nested Set Patch for Rails 2.1 Message-ID: <520078ad0807081450u21d7da23y3a31d546b8278181@mail.gmail.com> I tried to send this proposed patch at the beginning of June, but failed and sent the man page. I then tried to reply and send the patch, but that obviously didn't make it. I apologize for being dumb. Here's the patch one more time. Apply the patch to betternestedset/lib/better_nested_set.rb. Just to let you all know, I've switched from Better Nested Set to Awesome Nested Set, and it's been a pretty much drop in replacement. The only thing to note that I know of is that add_child is fully removed instead of deprecated in favor of move_to_child_of. Here's the repo for awesome nested set: http://github.com/collectiveidea/awesome_nested_set/tree/master I don't mean to start any conflict about which project you should be using, but it just seems that better nested set is no longer maintained. Thanks, Tony Hillerson -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: better_nested_set.rb.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1681 bytes Desc: not available URL: From kevin at mopacmedia.com Tue Jul 8 19:05:32 2008 From: kevin at mopacmedia.com (Kevin Triplett) Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 18:05:32 -0500 Subject: [Betternestedset-talk] Better Nested Set Patch for Rails 2.1 In-Reply-To: <520078ad0807081450u21d7da23y3a31d546b8278181@mail.gmail.com> References: <520078ad0807081450u21d7da23y3a31d546b8278181@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4873F2BC.10107@mopacmedia.com> Excellent! I was waiting for a nested set plugin to be hosted at github. Thanks! I'll try to submit a patch for my move_to_tree_of method there in the next two weeks, if everything looks good with ANS. Tony Hillerson wrote: > I tried to send this proposed patch at the beginning of June, but > failed and sent the man page. I then tried to reply and send the > patch, but that obviously didn't make it. I apologize for being dumb. > Here's the patch one more time. Apply the patch to > betternestedset/lib/better_nested_set.rb. > > Just to let you all know, I've switched from Better Nested Set to > Awesome Nested Set, and it's been a pretty much drop in replacement. > The only thing to note that I know of is that add_child is fully > removed instead of deprecated in favor of move_to_child_of. > > Here's the repo for awesome nested set: > http://github.com/collectiveidea/awesome_nested_set/tree/master > > I don't mean to start any conflict about which project you should be > using, but it just seems that better nested set is no longer > maintained. > > Thanks, > Tony Hillerson > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Betternestedset-talk mailing list > Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk From chris at cobaltedge.com Tue Jul 15 04:36:12 2008 From: chris at cobaltedge.com (Christopher Bailey) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:36:12 -0700 Subject: [Betternestedset-talk] Better Nested Set Patch for Rails 2.1 In-Reply-To: <520078ad0807081450u21d7da23y3a31d546b8278181@mail.gmail.com> References: <520078ad0807081450u21d7da23y3a31d546b8278181@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <443c240c0807150136n17623843x6474743a96de5b65@mail.gmail.com> Tony, does deletion/destroy work properly for you with ANS? I've been looking at possibly switching as well, as ANS solves one problem I have, but destroy's don't seem to proplery destroy all descendants. For example, if I have "locations", and say I have Califnornia, and it has two direct children, "Los Angeles" and "San Francisco". When I delete California, it only deletes one of the child cities. On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Tony Hillerson wrote: > I tried to send this proposed patch at the beginning of June, but > failed and sent the man page. I then tried to reply and send the > patch, but that obviously didn't make it. I apologize for being dumb. > Here's the patch one more time. Apply the patch to > betternestedset/lib/better_nested_set.rb. > > Just to let you all know, I've switched from Better Nested Set to > Awesome Nested Set, and it's been a pretty much drop in replacement. > The only thing to note that I know of is that add_child is fully > removed instead of deprecated in favor of move_to_child_of. > > Here's the repo for awesome nested set: > http://github.com/collectiveidea/awesome_nested_set/tree/master > > I don't mean to start any conflict about which project you should be > using, but it just seems that better nested set is no longer > maintained. > > Thanks, > Tony Hillerson > > _______________________________________________ > Betternestedset-talk mailing list > Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk > > -- Christopher Bailey Cobalt Edge LLC http://cobaltedge.com From Tony.Hillerson at effectiveui.com Tue Jul 15 10:22:58 2008 From: Tony.Hillerson at effectiveui.com (Tony Hillerson) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 08:22:58 -0600 Subject: [Betternestedset-talk] Better Nested Set Patch for Rails 2.1 In-Reply-To: <443c240c0807150136n17623843x6474743a96de5b65@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: We did some tests on that and it seems that destroying the root destroys all the children. On 7/15/08 2:36 AM, "Christopher Bailey" wrote: Tony, does deletion/destroy work properly for you with ANS? I've been looking at possibly switching as well, as ANS solves one problem I have, but destroy's don't seem to proplery destroy all descendants. For example, if I have "locations", and say I have Califnornia, and it has two direct children, "Los Angeles" and "San Francisco". When I delete California, it only deletes one of the child cities. On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Tony Hillerson wrote: > I tried to send this proposed patch at the beginning of June, but > failed and sent the man page. I then tried to reply and send the > patch, but that obviously didn't make it. I apologize for being dumb. > Here's the patch one more time. Apply the patch to > betternestedset/lib/better_nested_set.rb. > > Just to let you all know, I've switched from Better Nested Set to > Awesome Nested Set, and it's been a pretty much drop in replacement. > The only thing to note that I know of is that add_child is fully > removed instead of deprecated in favor of move_to_child_of. > > Here's the repo for awesome nested set: > http://github.com/collectiveidea/awesome_nested_set/tree/master > > I don't mean to start any conflict about which project you should be > using, but it just seems that better nested set is no longer > maintained. > > Thanks, > Tony Hillerson > > _______________________________________________ > Betternestedset-talk mailing list > Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk > > -- Christopher Bailey Cobalt Edge LLC http://cobaltedge.com _______________________________________________ Betternestedset-talk mailing list Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From chris at cobaltedge.com Tue Jul 15 12:04:36 2008 From: chris at cobaltedge.com (Christopher Bailey) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:04:36 -0700 Subject: [Betternestedset-talk] Better Nested Set Patch for Rails 2.1 In-Reply-To: References: <443c240c0807150136n17623843x6474743a96de5b65@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <443c240c0807150904u235c1ad6n6ad7993e2a140e0f@mail.gmail.com> I'm still having issues. But, after applying your Rails 2.1 patch to BNS, I'm good to go there. For anyone interested, I have Better Nested Set on GitHub, with this patch applied: http://github.com/chris/better_nested_set/tree/master On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 7:22 AM, Tony Hillerson wrote: > We did some tests on that and it seems that destroying the root destroys all > the children. > > > On 7/15/08 2:36 AM, "Christopher Bailey" wrote: > > Tony, does deletion/destroy work properly for you with ANS? I've been > looking at possibly switching as well, as ANS solves one problem I > have, but destroy's don't seem to proplery destroy all descendants. > For example, if I have "locations", and say I have Califnornia, and it > has two direct children, "Los Angeles" and "San Francisco". When I > delete California, it only deletes one of the child cities. > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Tony Hillerson > wrote: >> I tried to send this proposed patch at the beginning of June, but >> failed and sent the man page. I then tried to reply and send the >> patch, but that obviously didn't make it. I apologize for being dumb. >> Here's the patch one more time. Apply the patch to >> betternestedset/lib/better_nested_set.rb. >> >> Just to let you all know, I've switched from Better Nested Set to >> Awesome Nested Set, and it's been a pretty much drop in replacement. >> The only thing to note that I know of is that add_child is fully >> removed instead of deprecated in favor of move_to_child_of. >> >> Here's the repo for awesome nested set: >> http://github.com/collectiveidea/awesome_nested_set/tree/master >> >> I don't mean to start any conflict about which project you should be >> using, but it just seems that better nested set is no longer >> maintained. >> >> Thanks, >> Tony Hillerson >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Betternestedset-talk mailing list >> Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk >> >> > > > > -- > Christopher Bailey > Cobalt Edge LLC > http://cobaltedge.com > _______________________________________________ > Betternestedset-talk mailing list > Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk > > > > _______________________________________________ > Betternestedset-talk mailing list > Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk > > -- Christopher Bailey Cobalt Edge LLC http://cobaltedge.com From jc.michel at symetrie.com Tue Jul 15 13:13:35 2008 From: jc.michel at symetrie.com (Jean-Christophe Michel) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:13:35 +0200 Subject: [Betternestedset-talk] Better Nested Set Patch for Rails 2.1 In-Reply-To: <443c240c0807150904u235c1ad6n6ad7993e2a140e0f@mail.gmail.com> References: <443c240c0807150136n17623843x6474743a96de5b65@mail.gmail.com> <443c240c0807150904u235c1ad6n6ad7993e2a140e0f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <2FE9E342-DB4A-4C5E-AF87-D4C01C8B1DEE@symetrie.com> Hi, Le 15 juil. 08 ? 18:04, Christopher Bailey a ?crit : > I'm still having issues. But, after applying your Rails 2.1 patch to > BNS, I'm good to go there. For anyone interested, I have Better > Nested Set on GitHub, with this patch applied: > > http://github.com/chris/better_nested_set/tree/master Thanks. I'll ask everybody to decide wether to migrate rubyforge to git. Jean-Christophe Michel -- symetrie.com Better Nested Set for rails: http://opensource.symetrie.com/trac/better_nested_set From jc.michel at symetrie.com Tue Jul 15 13:15:43 2008 From: jc.michel at symetrie.com (Jean-Christophe Michel) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:15:43 +0200 Subject: [Betternestedset-talk] migrate rubyforge to git ? Message-ID: Hi, On rubyforge we can not have together svn and git. What do you prefer : ? keep svn ? migrate to git Thansk ! Jean-Christophe Michel -- symetrie.com Better Nested Set for rails: http://opensource.symetrie.com/trac/better_nested_set -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From zach.dennis at gmail.com Tue Jul 15 13:31:03 2008 From: zach.dennis at gmail.com (Zach Dennis) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:31:03 -0400 Subject: [Betternestedset-talk] migrate rubyforge to git ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <85d99afe0807151031n6fb3812cie605ca8abc3f6aaf@mail.gmail.com> You can use git with an svn backend. The two can be joined happily together. =) Zach On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Jean-Christophe Michel < jc.michel at symetrie.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > On rubyforge we can not have together svn and git. > What do you prefer : > > ? keep svn > ? migrate to git > > Thansk ! > > Jean-Christophe Michel > -- > symetrie.com > > Better Nested Set for rails: > http://opensource.symetrie.com/trac/better_nested_set > > > > _______________________________________________ > Betternestedset-talk mailing list > Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk > > -- Zach Dennis http://www.continuousthinking.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Tony.Hillerson at effectiveui.com Tue Jul 15 13:20:26 2008 From: Tony.Hillerson at effectiveui.com (Tony Hillerson) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:20:26 -0600 Subject: [Betternestedset-talk] migrate rubyforge to git ? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Hey Jean-Christophe, I prefer git. Also, I think it'd be worth it to try to sync up with Awesome Nested Set and get them back together so we can have "One True Nested Set". On 7/15/08 11:15 AM, "Jean-Christophe Michel" wrote: Hi, On rubyforge we can not have together svn and git. What do you prefer : - keep svn - migrate to git Thansk ! Jean-Christophe Michel -- symetrie.com Better Nested Set for rails: http://opensource.symetrie.com/trac/better_nested_set -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jc.michel at symetrie.com Tue Jul 15 13:51:26 2008 From: jc.michel at symetrie.com (Jean-Christophe Michel) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:51:26 +0200 Subject: [Betternestedset-talk] migrate rubyforge to git ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3B2DD65D-C41D-449E-844A-03B05117F835@symetrie.com> Hi, Le 15 juil. 08 ? 19:20, Tony Hillerson a ?crit : > Hey Jean-Christophe, > > I prefer git. Also, I think it?d be worth it to try to sync up with > Awesome Nested Set and get them back together so we can have ?One > True Nested Set?. True. Why not branch on http://github.com/rails/acts_as_nested_set/ tree ? Jean-Christophe Michel -- symetrie.com Better Nested Set for rails: http://opensource.symetrie.com/trac/better_nested_set -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kevin at mopacmedia.com Tue Jul 15 14:42:25 2008 From: kevin at mopacmedia.com (Kevin Triplett) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:42:25 -0500 Subject: [Betternestedset-talk] migrate rubyforge to git ? In-Reply-To: <3B2DD65D-C41D-449E-844A-03B05117F835@symetrie.com> References: <3B2DD65D-C41D-449E-844A-03B05117F835@symetrie.com> Message-ID: <487CEF91.5090609@mopacmedia.com> +1 vote for simply calling it "nested_set" -- the "acts_as" is becoming superfluous. :) Kevin Jean-Christophe Michel wrote: > Hi, > > Le 15 juil. 08 ? 19:20, Tony Hillerson a ?crit : > >> Hey Jean-Christophe, >> >> I prefer git. Also, I think it?d be worth it to try to sync up with >> Awesome Nested Set and get them back together so we can have ?One True >> Nested Set?. > > True. Why not branch on http://github.com/rails/acts_as_nested_set/tree ? > > > Jean-Christophe Michel > -- > symetrie.com > > Better Nested Set for rails: > http://opensource.symetrie.com/trac/better_nested_set > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Betternestedset-talk mailing list > Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk From Tony.Hillerson at effectiveui.com Tue Jul 15 14:52:10 2008 From: Tony.Hillerson at effectiveui.com (Tony Hillerson) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:52:10 -0600 Subject: [Betternestedset-talk] migrate rubyforge to git ? In-Reply-To: <85d99afe0807151031n6fb3812cie605ca8abc3f6aaf@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Git-svn workflow is different enough from git that in a team setting it's just a little sugar on svn. A vote for git is a vote for a different workflow entirely... On 7/15/08 11:31 AM, "Zach Dennis" wrote: You can use git with an svn backend. The two can be joined happily together. =) Zach On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Jean-Christophe Michel wrote: Hi, On rubyforge we can not have together svn and git. What do you prefer : - keep svn - migrate to git Thansk ! Jean-Christophe Michel -- symetrie.com Better Nested Set for rails: http://opensource.symetrie.com/trac/better_nested_set _______________________________________________ Betternestedset-talk mailing list Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cnk at caltech.edu Tue Jul 15 14:57:50 2008 From: cnk at caltech.edu (Cynthia Kiser) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:57:50 -0700 Subject: [Betternestedset-talk] migrate rubyforge to git ? In-Reply-To: <3B2DD65D-C41D-449E-844A-03B05117F835@symetrie.com> References: <3B2DD65D-C41D-449E-844A-03B05117F835@symetrie.com> Message-ID: <20080715185749.GC19692@sue.caltech.edu> > >I prefer git. Also, I think it?d be worth it to try to sync up with > >Awesome Nested Set and get them back together so we can have ?One > >True Nested Set?. > > True. Why not branch on http://github.com/rails/acts_as_nested_set/ > tree ? Easy forking and reintegration is a plus for git so I vote for git. From chris at cobaltedge.com Tue Jul 15 15:20:29 2008 From: chris at cobaltedge.com (Christopher Bailey) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:20:29 -0700 Subject: [Betternestedset-talk] migrate rubyforge to git ? In-Reply-To: <20080715185749.GC19692@sue.caltech.edu> References: <3B2DD65D-C41D-449E-844A-03B05117F835@symetrie.com> <20080715185749.GC19692@sue.caltech.edu> Message-ID: <443c240c0807151220x7b421dc4oc2f6ea247f7410d8@mail.gmail.com> I'd vote not only for Git, but for GitHub. On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Cynthia Kiser wrote: >> >I prefer git. Also, I think it?d be worth it to try to sync up with >> >Awesome Nested Set and get them back together so we can have ?One >> >True Nested Set?. >> >> True. Why not branch on http://github.com/rails/acts_as_nested_set/ >> tree ? > > Easy forking and reintegration is a plus for git so I vote for git. > _______________________________________________ > Betternestedset-talk mailing list > Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk > -- Christopher Bailey Cobalt Edge LLC http://cobaltedge.com From tim at brooklynpenguin.com Tue Jul 15 15:07:46 2008 From: tim at brooklynpenguin.com (Tim Olsen) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:07:46 -0400 Subject: [Betternestedset-talk] migrate rubyforge to git ? In-Reply-To: <20080715185749.GC19692@sue.caltech.edu> References: <3B2DD65D-C41D-449E-844A-03B05117F835@symetrie.com> <20080715185749.GC19692@sue.caltech.edu> Message-ID: <487CF582.9050105@brooklynpenguin.com> Cynthia Kiser wrote: >>> I prefer git. Also, I think it?d be worth it to try to sync up with >>> Awesome Nested Set and get them back together so we can have ?One >>> True Nested Set?. >> True. Why not branch on http://github.com/rails/acts_as_nested_set/ >> tree ? > > Easy forking and reintegration is a plus for git so I vote for git. +1 for git. It would be nice to recreate the full git history to include acts_as_nested_set and awesome_nested_set (and get awesome_nested_set to graft onto that history) but it could be a lot of work to do so. -Tim > _______________________________________________ > Betternestedset-talk mailing list > Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk From kevin at mopacmedia.com Tue Jul 15 23:52:54 2008 From: kevin at mopacmedia.com (Kevin Triplett) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:52:54 -0500 Subject: [Betternestedset-talk] migrate rubyforge to git ? In-Reply-To: <487CEF91.5090609@mopacmedia.com> References: <3B2DD65D-C41D-449E-844A-03B05117F835@symetrie.com> <487CEF91.5090609@mopacmedia.com> Message-ID: <487D7096.6020706@mopacmedia.com> Github has been a great experience for me, both for hosting plugins and collaborating on others. Kevin Triplett wrote: > +1 vote for simply calling it "nested_set" -- the "acts_as" is becoming > superfluous. :) > > Kevin > > > Jean-Christophe Michel wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Le 15 juil. 08 ? 19:20, Tony Hillerson a ?crit : >> >>> Hey Jean-Christophe, >>> >>> I prefer git. Also, I think it?d be worth it to try to sync up with >>> Awesome Nested Set and get them back together so we can have ?One >>> True Nested Set?. >> >> True. Why not branch on http://github.com/rails/acts_as_nested_set/tree ? >> >> >> Jean-Christophe Michel >> -- >> symetrie.com >> >> Better Nested Set for rails: >> http://opensource.symetrie.com/trac/better_nested_set >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Betternestedset-talk mailing list >> Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk > _______________________________________________ > Betternestedset-talk mailing list > Betternestedset-talk at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/betternestedset-talk >