[Backgroundrb-devel] Upper limit to number of jobs queued by BDRb?
gethemant at gmail.com
Fri May 30 15:01:09 EDT 2008
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 10:25 -0700, Raghu Srinivasan wrote:
> Hi Hemant - no, I am not using thread_pool right now. I do have two
> separate workers like you and Ryan Leavengood suggested - one for the
> batch process and the other for the live/web user initiated process -
> which by the way works out great, thanks!.
> How are other folks handling 1000s of RSS refreshes? Via BDRb - or
> something else? Is BDRb really the best tool for what I am trying to
> do? I'd really appreciate if others could share their experiences.
okay, then it shouldn't be a problem. Can you try git version of
backgroundrb as suggest in following link and report us back?
More information about the Backgroundrb-devel