[Backgroundrb-devel] State of backgroundrb (dupe?)
kitplummer at gmail.com
Fri Mar 21 16:28:05 EDT 2008
I too have been fine with the 1.0.3 stuff. New dependencies...but, no
I'm curious though...what else is there? If you were to go looking
what would you find?
On Mar 21, 2008, at 1:10 PM, Eric Pugh wrote:
> In my experience, I have found the 1.0.3 version more stable then the
> older one.. Admittedly I am not running lots of workloads through it,
> but it has been easier to setup and to code against...
> On Mar 21, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Morten Primdahl wrote:
>> Hi, pardon if this is a duplicate mail, I forgot to click the
>> subscription link the first time around.
>> I've been using backgroundrb for a while now (older version) and I've
>> had so many headaches because of it that I began looking for a
>> replacement technology. And then I saw the new and shiny backgroundrb
>> website, looking good!
>> Initially I used the version maintained by skaar, but had some long
>> forgotten issues. On Ezras recommendation, I changed to the latest
>> version he did (a downgrade so to speak), and this has been okay, but
>> we see some connectivity issues with that once it's been running
>> for a
>> while, eg. druby://10.1.65.87:22222 - #<Errno::ECONNREFUSED:
>> Connection refused - connect(2)>
>> So, I'm here to ask, what's the state of backgroundrb 1.0.3? How much
>> has changed since Herman took over? Is it ready for production and
>> rock solid? Or should I go look for something else?
>> Backgroundrb-devel mailing list
>> Backgroundrb-devel at rubyforge.org
> Eric Pugh | Principal | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | http://www.opensourceconnections.com
> Backgroundrb-devel mailing list
> Backgroundrb-devel at rubyforge.org
More information about the Backgroundrb-devel