[Backgroundrb-devel] State of backgroundrb (dupe?)
epugh at opensourceconnections.com
Fri Mar 21 16:10:40 EDT 2008
In my experience, I have found the 1.0.3 version more stable then the
older one.. Admittedly I am not running lots of workloads through it,
but it has been easier to setup and to code against...
On Mar 21, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Morten Primdahl wrote:
> Hi, pardon if this is a duplicate mail, I forgot to click the
> subscription link the first time around.
> I've been using backgroundrb for a while now (older version) and I've
> had so many headaches because of it that I began looking for a
> replacement technology. And then I saw the new and shiny backgroundrb
> website, looking good!
> Initially I used the version maintained by skaar, but had some long
> forgotten issues. On Ezras recommendation, I changed to the latest
> version he did (a downgrade so to speak), and this has been okay, but
> we see some connectivity issues with that once it's been running for a
> while, eg. druby://10.1.65.87:22222 - #<Errno::ECONNREFUSED:
> Connection refused - connect(2)>
> So, I'm here to ask, what's the state of backgroundrb 1.0.3? How much
> has changed since Herman took over? Is it ready for production and
> rock solid? Or should I go look for something else?
> Backgroundrb-devel mailing list
> Backgroundrb-devel at rubyforge.org
Eric Pugh | Principal | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | http://www.opensourceconnections.com
More information about the Backgroundrb-devel