[Backgroundrb-devel] Using the ip flag
gethemant at gmail.com
Fri Mar 14 00:50:03 EDT 2008
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 16:26 +0000, Anthony Underwood wrote:
> I am also interested in doing the same (2 servers running mongrels
> (IPs 158.119.147.x and 158.119.147.y) with another server (IP
> 158.119.147.z) running background jobs).
> To clarify I would have the rails apps on both x and y with the
> backgroundrb.yml file specifying 158.119.147.z).
Yes that would certainly work!
> What would I need on the backgroundrb server- just the backgroundrb
> Would I also need a backgroundrb.yml file on this machine and does the
> IP here specify which machines to accept backgroundrb jobs from -
> would I set this to 126.96.36.199?
> How would I start the backgroundrb script on the background job
What you will need on BackgrounDRb server is the backgroundrb.yml file
and your rails application ( because you want access to your rails
environment in BackgrounDRB workers ). You won't need to run any
mongrels on that machine and on machines running mongrels you can just
point ip of BackgrounDRB server in backgroundrb.yml file and it should
suffice. Let us know, how it goes for you!
> Thanks for all your help
> On 12 Mar 2008, at 23:29, Noah Horton wrote:
> > Then I would make the default yml file have a comment above the
> > default saying “This doesn’t work on MacOS, you can use 0.0.0.0 but
> > it will allow open network connections too”.
> > I would wager that 80%+ of BackgroundRB deployments have not secured
> > this since the security implications are not noted at all. This
> > seems really dangerous.
> > On 3/12/08 3:52 PM, "hemant kumar" <gethemant at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 14:43 -0700, Noah Horton wrote:
> > > Wait – the default config used in all the examples has the
> > > backgroundrb workers listening to connections from all
> > public
> > > interfaces? That seems like a really risky thing.
> > Perhaps the
> > > examples should all get updated to ‘localhost’.
> > >
> > Except 'localhost' doesn't work on Mac OSX from my
> > experience.
> > >
> > > On 3/12/08 2:02 PM, "Ryan Leavengood"
> > <leavengood at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Noah Horton
> > > <noah at rapouts.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Is there any config to get the backgroundrb
> > instances to
> > > listen to requests
> > > > from any machine besides localhost?
> > >
> > > If you use the same backgroundrb.yml used for your
> > Mongrel
> > > machines on
> > > the BackgrounDRb machine (which you should), then
> > it should
> > > listen on
> > > the machine's IP which you have configured in that
> > file. If
> > > you want
> > > it to listen to all interfaces then use 0.0.0.0
> > like hemant
> > > said in
> > > his previous post.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ryan
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Backgroundrb-devel mailing list
> > > Backgroundrb-devel at rubyforge.org
> > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/backgroundrb-devel
> > _______________________________________________
> > Backgroundrb-devel mailing list
> > Backgroundrb-devel at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/backgroundrb-devel
> Backgroundrb-devel mailing list
> Backgroundrb-devel at rubyforge.org
More information about the Backgroundrb-devel