[Backgroundrb-devel] OS dependence
gethemant at gmail.com
Thu Jul 31 08:20:53 EDT 2008
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 4:59 PM, P Baker <me at retrodict.com> wrote:
> I was hoping to avoid introducing another dependency with memcached, but
> I'll consider it.
Well, think in long run, assuming your workers store hundreds of
thousands of objects in worker cache. How will Ruby take that? I bet,
half the time will be spent in trying to garbage collect the shit. So,
if you are planning to cache results at all, memcache is certainly far
better solution. Of course, you can keep using inbuilt cache, but it
will scale only so such.
More information about the Backgroundrb-devel