[Backgroundrb-devel] Worker suicide
gethemant at gmail.com
Thu Jan 10 15:16:37 EST 2008
On Jan 11, 2008 1:12 AM, John O'Shea <joshea at nooked.com> wrote:
> By co-incidence I have the same use case - the (dynamically created) worker
> process is exiting just fine when it hits the exit at the end of the create
> method. However, subsequent calls to MiddleMan.query_all_workers still
> lists the worker and its last known status. I have a web UI for monitoring
> worker activity so this is a little misleading for our admins.
Thats intentional, although name is a misnomer I admit. But if you
want to find the workers which are currently running,use
> Is there any way to get the master to realize the worker is gone? I am also
> seeing "Some read error" messages in the backroundrb console and judging
> from a related discussion at
> the master isn't cleaning up the socket connection to the worker (and
> removing the worker from its internal lists).
> (I'm running from the 1.0 release tag btw).
Master DOES realize when a worker is gone and please upgrade to trunk
or 1.0.1 release. Its rather important and above
method(all_worker_info) has been added in 1.0.1 only.
Let them talk of their oriental summer climes of everlasting
conservatories; give me the privilege of making my own summer with my
More information about the Backgroundrb-devel