[Backgroundrb-devel] 100meg logger worker?

Ian Smith-Heisters heisters at greenriver.org
Tue Feb 5 00:12:35 EST 2008

On 2/4/08, Noah Horton <noah at rapouts.com> wrote:
>   3) I seemed to have a memory leak the first time I deployed, where the
> processes kept growing in a stair-step pattern of 50 meg stairs.  My best
> hypothesis is that objects passed into ask_worker get kept in some
> datastructure that never goes away, and thus if you pass any objects there,
> things balloon; is that correct?  If not, do you have any thoughts on common
> 'gotchas' that could cause memory growth?

With an old version I found that I had to explicitly call #kill at the
end of the task, or the object would sit around forever. I don't think
there's an equivalent in the new version, or what version you're
running, so I've no idea if that will solve your question.


More information about the Backgroundrb-devel mailing list