[Backgroundrb-devel] no view involved...
cremes.devlist at mac.com
Tue Jun 6 21:32:07 EDT 2006
On Jun 6, 2006, at 8:06 PM, Ezra Zygmuntowicz wrote:
> No dependency that I can forsee, you can keep pushing things out
> to more drb servers on other computers. In fact the next release
> will allow your worker classes to have 'slaves' a slave is another
> drb server run in a forked process that will only stay alive as
> long as your worker stays alive. So your worker class could
> potentially start a bunch of new processes to do heavy lifting and
> this slave feature will make it very easy. Details soon.
Ah, the slave gem! I've been futzing with that lately too...
You're doing great work. Better yet, you're doing work that I would
be doing if it wasn't for you. Er, or something like that! :-)
More information about the Backgroundrb-devel