[Backgroundrb-devel] no view involved...

[Chuck Remes]

On Jun 6, 2006, at 8:06 PM, Ezra Zygmuntowicz wrote:

>
> 	No dependency that I can forsee, you can keep pushing things out  
> to more drb servers on other computers. In fact the next release  
> will allow your worker classes to have 'slaves' a slave is another  
> drb server run in a forked process that will only stay alive as  
> long as your worker stays alive. So your worker class could  
> potentially start a bunch of new processes to do heavy lifting and  
> this slave feature will make it very easy. Details soon.
>
> -Ezra

Ah, the slave gem! I've been futzing with that lately too...

You're doing great work. Better yet, you're doing work that I would  
be doing if it wasn't for you. Er, or something like that! :-)

cr