From Dominik.Mayer at BeAgile.de Mon Jun 9 05:36:17 2008 From: Dominik.Mayer at BeAgile.de (Dominik Mayer) Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:36:17 +0200 Subject: [Activewarehouse-discuss] Rails 2.1 Message-ID: <484CF991.70502@BeAgile.de> Hallo Everyone, I'm running active_warehouse on RoR 2.0.2. Now that Rails 2.1 is out, I'm wondering has anyone tried to get AW working on 2.1? Any changes or intervention needed? Dominik From mghaught at gmail.com Mon Jun 9 09:02:36 2008 From: mghaught at gmail.com (Marty Haught) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 07:02:36 -0600 Subject: [Activewarehouse-discuss] Rails 2.1 In-Reply-To: <484CF991.70502@BeAgile.de> References: <484CF991.70502@BeAgile.de> Message-ID: <57f29e620806090602s2cc32f47p124ebcb7df803b16@mail.gmail.com> > I'm running active_warehouse on RoR 2.0.2. Now that Rails 2.1 is out, I'm > wondering has anyone tried to get AW working on 2.1? Any changes or > intervention needed? We have not attempted the upgrade yet. Cheers, Marty From thibaut.barrere at gmail.com Mon Jun 9 09:08:11 2008 From: thibaut.barrere at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Thibaut_Barr=E8re?=) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 15:08:11 +0200 Subject: [Activewarehouse-discuss] Rails 2.1 In-Reply-To: <57f29e620806090602s2cc32f47p124ebcb7df803b16@mail.gmail.com> References: <484CF991.70502@BeAgile.de> <57f29e620806090602s2cc32f47p124ebcb7df803b16@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4a68b8cf0806090608h72254b66n72b9e5853e489b8c@mail.gmail.com> > We have not attempted the upgrade yet. > Same here - I'm not on 2.0 yet at all. Could you keep us posted if you do it ? cheers, Thibaut -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Dominik.Mayer at BeAgile.de Mon Jun 9 09:12:02 2008 From: Dominik.Mayer at BeAgile.de (Dominik Mayer) Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:12:02 +0200 Subject: [Activewarehouse-discuss] Rails 2.1 In-Reply-To: <4a68b8cf0806090608h72254b66n72b9e5853e489b8c@mail.gmail.com> References: <484CF991.70502@BeAgile.de> <57f29e620806090602s2cc32f47p124ebcb7df803b16@mail.gmail.com> <4a68b8cf0806090608h72254b66n72b9e5853e489b8c@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <484D2C22.3050707@BeAgile.de> Thibaut Barr?re schrieb: > > We have not attempted the upgrade yet. > > > Same here - I'm not on 2.0 yet at all. Could you keep us posted if you > do it ? of course! 2.0.2 is running well for me. i'm gonna try upgrading to 2.1 next week (got some other stuff to do until then). - dominik From casret at gmail.com Mon Jun 9 14:58:58 2008 From: casret at gmail.com (casret) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 11:58:58 -0700 Subject: [Activewarehouse-discuss] Rails 2.1 In-Reply-To: <484D2C22.3050707@BeAgile.de> References: <484CF991.70502@BeAgile.de> <57f29e620806090602s2cc32f47p124ebcb7df803b16@mail.gmail.com> <4a68b8cf0806090608h72254b66n72b9e5853e489b8c@mail.gmail.com> <484D2C22.3050707@BeAgile.de> Message-ID: <2e74739d0806091158y19ebddcbo69b4106febf8d01b@mail.gmail.com> I had updated the gems for a different rails project, and activerecord 2.1 breaks the etl at the very least, I rollbacked the gems since I didn't have time to debug it. On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Dominik Mayer wrote: > > > Thibaut Barr?re schrieb: > >> >> We have not attempted the upgrade yet. >> >> >> Same here - I'm not on 2.0 yet at all. Could you keep us posted if you do >> it ? >> > > of course! > > 2.0.2 is running well for me. i'm gonna try upgrading to 2.1 next week (got > some other stuff to do until then). > > - dominik > > _______________________________________________ > Activewarehouse-discuss mailing list > Activewarehouse-discuss at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/activewarehouse-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jackhongx at gmail.com Mon Jun 9 19:23:55 2008 From: jackhongx at gmail.com (Jack Cuili Hong) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:23:55 +1000 Subject: [Activewarehouse-discuss] Rails 2.1 In-Reply-To: <2e74739d0806091158y19ebddcbo69b4106febf8d01b@mail.gmail.com> References: <484CF991.70502@BeAgile.de> <57f29e620806090602s2cc32f47p124ebcb7df803b16@mail.gmail.com> <4a68b8cf0806090608h72254b66n72b9e5853e489b8c@mail.gmail.com> <484D2C22.3050707@BeAgile.de> <2e74739d0806091158y19ebddcbo69b4106febf8d01b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: activerecord 2.1 complained about certain function calls in etl gem. 2008/6/10 casret : > I had updated the gems for a different rails project, and activerecord 2.1 > breaks the etl at the very least, I rollbacked the gems since I didn't have > time to debug it. > > On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Dominik Mayer > wrote: >> >> >> Thibaut Barr?re schrieb: >>> >>> We have not attempted the upgrade yet. >>> >>> >>> Same here - I'm not on 2.0 yet at all. Could you keep us posted if you do >>> it ? >> >> of course! >> >> 2.0.2 is running well for me. i'm gonna try upgrading to 2.1 next week >> (got some other stuff to do until then). >> >> - dominik >> _______________________________________________ >> Activewarehouse-discuss mailing list >> Activewarehouse-discuss at rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/activewarehouse-discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > Activewarehouse-discuss mailing list > Activewarehouse-discuss at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/activewarehouse-discuss > > From toby at tobyorourke.org Fri Jun 27 09:43:31 2008 From: toby at tobyorourke.org (Toby O'Rourke) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:43:31 +0100 Subject: [Activewarehouse-discuss] Please Help: Type 1 SCD keeps writing new rows rather than changing existing? Message-ID: <4864EE83.2000700@tobyorourke.org> Hi, I've just started working with activewarehouse-etl to do some etl operations between an existing legacy db and a new rails app. I'm trying to use Type 1 SCD to make changes to existing rows in the db rather than writing a new record every time there is a change. At the moment, I'm just trying to prove the concept with a simple example which moves data between two dbs with no changes. The .ctl file I've created is below. I'm having trouble seeing how I can tell it that record x should map to record x' in the destination database. I'm sure I'm missing something obvious, Please help! Also, I'm willing to update the documentation around SCD's with whatever I learn here - how do I go about it? Many thanks, Toby. ----------------- groups.ctl ----------------------- source :in, {:type => :database, :target => :legacy, :table => 'groups'}, [:group_code, :name, :email] destination :out, { :scd => {:type => 1 }, :scd_fields => [:email], :type => :database, :target => :development, :table => 'groups' }, { :order => [:group_code, :name, :email] }