Forums | Admin Discussion Forums: open-discussion Start New Thread Nested Flat Threaded Ultimate Show 25 Show 50 Show 75 Show 100   By: Nobody RE: Why only good for "lightweight games"? [ reply ]   2009-03-14 00:17 Ruby 1.8 is very slow. In my test, it was 4 times slower than Python, which was 4 times slower than Lua. Ruby 1.9 is much faster, but I haven't had a chance to play with it. By: Nobody RE: Why only good for "lightweight games"? [ reply ]   2008-05-14 20:48 I don't think G3D has any limitation, we made a game and it has excelent performance ! I don't know what about Ruby. Thanks. By: Nobody Why only good for "lightweight games"? [ reply ]   2008-04-22 15:45 I'm really glad you made G3DRuby! Why do you say it would only be good for building lightweight games or demos? Is there something about G3D or Ruby that makes it scale poorly?