Forums | Admin

Discussion Forums: open-discussion

Start New Thread Start New Thread

 

By: Erlend Simonsen
RE: does Revision 53 from SVN seem slow. [ reply ]  
2007-10-18 06:36
With that amount, you should really show just a percentage of the traffic as blobs. I'll try and add an option to do that today.

-- Erlend

By: kyle buttress
RE: does Revision 53 from SVN seem slow. [ reply ]  
2007-10-17 22:01
Yep am / have been running 6.14.10.5885


It starts off good but we are quite busy

252 frames in 5.047 seconds = 49.931 FPS
Elements[274], Activities[988], Blobs[110/161]
46 frames in 5.044 seconds = 9.120 FPS
Elements[319], Activities[2725], Blobs[141/191]
27 frames in 5.085 seconds = 5.310 FPS
Elements[349], Activities[3996], Blobs[147/195]
20 frames in 5.040 seconds = 3.968 FPS
Elements[386], Activities[5260], Blobs[158/203]
15 frames in 5.233 seconds = 2.866 FPS
Elements[468], Activities[6676], Blobs[178/228]
12 frames in 5.173 seconds = 2.320 FPS
Elements[539], Activities[8053], Blobs[203/255]
9 frames in 5.481 seconds = 1.642 FPS
Elements[622], Activities[9966], Blobs[215/268]
10 frames in 5.151 seconds = 1.941 FPS
Elements[662], Activities[10955], Blobs[229/280]
9 frames in 5.166 seconds = 1.742 FPS
Elements[699], Activities[12029], Blobs[237/287]
8 frames in 5.444 seconds = 1.470 FPS
Elements[766], Activities[13882], Blobs[257/309]
7 frames in 5.268 seconds = 1.329 FPS
Elements[808], Activities[15520], Blobs[268/321]
6 frames in 5.365 seconds = 1.118 FPS
Elements[855], Activities[17357], Blobs[278/331]
5 frames in 5.137 seconds = 0.973 FPS
Elements[900], Activities[18878], Blobs[293/347]
5 frames in 5.207 seconds = 0.960 FPS
Elements[980], Activities[20202], Blobs[310/361]
5 frames in 5.925 seconds = 0.844 FPS
Elements[931], Activities[21879], Blobs[330/389]
5 frames in 6.110 seconds = 0.818 FPS
Elements[941], Activities[23246], Blobs[343/395]
4 frames in 5.530 seconds = 0.723 FPS
Elements[971], Activities[25107], Blobs[354/408]
4 frames in 6.391 seconds = 0.626 FPS
Elements[1053], Activities[27547], Blobs[373/422]
4 frames in 6.863 seconds = 0.583 FPS
Elements[1050], Activities[29680], Blobs[392/446]
3 frames in 6.105 seconds = 0.491 FPS

does work though ;o)

By: Erlend Simonsen
RE: does Revision 53 from SVN seem slow. [ reply ]  
2007-10-17 09:34
Most probably you're running in software rendering mode, as you should be getting way more FPS.

Please try to install the Catalyst drivers from ATI, instead of the ones that shipped with your computer as those don't include the accelerated OpenGL library.

(You can check this by opening the Catalyst Control Center, selecting advanced, and clicking Information Center / Graphics Software. It should say something along the lines of OpenGL version 6.14.10....)

-- Erlend

-- Erlend

By: kyle buttress
RE: does Revision 53 from SVN seem slow. [ reply ]  
2007-10-17 09:24
I have a radon x1300 on a windows xp machine that is approx 3 months old.

in r46 I was getting a frame rate of approx 15 - 20
in r 53 it dropped to a frame rate of 1 - 2


By: Erlend Simonsen
RE: does Revision 53 from SVN seem slow. [ reply ]  
2007-10-17 07:00
What extra color mapping? What kind of framerate did you get with r46 and with r53?

By: kyle buttress
does Revision 53 from SVN seem slow. [ reply ]  
2007-10-17 00:00
I've just updated the libraries here and to me it feels that the extra colour mapping etc stow things a fair bit. As compared to revision 46.

Does anyone else have a similar feeling.