Forums | Admin Discussion Forums: open-discussion Start New Thread Nested Flat Threaded Ultimate Show 25 Show 50 Show 75 Show 100   By: Erlend Simonsen RE: does Revision 53 from SVN seem slow. [ reply ]   2007-10-18 06:36 With that amount, you should really show just a percentage of the traffic as blobs. I'll try and add an option to do that today. -- Erlend By: kyle buttress RE: does Revision 53 from SVN seem slow. [ reply ]   2007-10-17 22:01 Yep am / have been running 6.14.10.5885 It starts off good but we are quite busy 252 frames in 5.047 seconds = 49.931 FPS Elements[274], Activities[988], Blobs[110/161] 46 frames in 5.044 seconds = 9.120 FPS Elements[319], Activities[2725], Blobs[141/191] 27 frames in 5.085 seconds = 5.310 FPS Elements[349], Activities[3996], Blobs[147/195] 20 frames in 5.040 seconds = 3.968 FPS Elements[386], Activities[5260], Blobs[158/203] 15 frames in 5.233 seconds = 2.866 FPS Elements[468], Activities[6676], Blobs[178/228] 12 frames in 5.173 seconds = 2.320 FPS Elements[539], Activities[8053], Blobs[203/255] 9 frames in 5.481 seconds = 1.642 FPS Elements[622], Activities[9966], Blobs[215/268] 10 frames in 5.151 seconds = 1.941 FPS Elements[662], Activities[10955], Blobs[229/280] 9 frames in 5.166 seconds = 1.742 FPS Elements[699], Activities[12029], Blobs[237/287] 8 frames in 5.444 seconds = 1.470 FPS Elements[766], Activities[13882], Blobs[257/309] 7 frames in 5.268 seconds = 1.329 FPS Elements[808], Activities[15520], Blobs[268/321] 6 frames in 5.365 seconds = 1.118 FPS Elements[855], Activities[17357], Blobs[278/331] 5 frames in 5.137 seconds = 0.973 FPS Elements[900], Activities[18878], Blobs[293/347] 5 frames in 5.207 seconds = 0.960 FPS Elements[980], Activities[20202], Blobs[310/361] 5 frames in 5.925 seconds = 0.844 FPS Elements[931], Activities[21879], Blobs[330/389] 5 frames in 6.110 seconds = 0.818 FPS Elements[941], Activities[23246], Blobs[343/395] 4 frames in 5.530 seconds = 0.723 FPS Elements[971], Activities[25107], Blobs[354/408] 4 frames in 6.391 seconds = 0.626 FPS Elements[1053], Activities[27547], Blobs[373/422] 4 frames in 6.863 seconds = 0.583 FPS Elements[1050], Activities[29680], Blobs[392/446] 3 frames in 6.105 seconds = 0.491 FPS does work though ;o) By: Erlend Simonsen RE: does Revision 53 from SVN seem slow. [ reply ]   2007-10-17 09:34 Most probably you're running in software rendering mode, as you should be getting way more FPS. Please try to install the Catalyst drivers from ATI, instead of the ones that shipped with your computer as those don't include the accelerated OpenGL library. (You can check this by opening the Catalyst Control Center, selecting advanced, and clicking Information Center / Graphics Software. It should say something along the lines of OpenGL version 6.14.10....) -- Erlend -- Erlend By: kyle buttress RE: does Revision 53 from SVN seem slow. [ reply ]   2007-10-17 09:24 I have a radon x1300 on a windows xp machine that is approx 3 months old. in r46 I was getting a frame rate of approx 15 - 20 in r 53 it dropped to a frame rate of 1 - 2 By: Erlend Simonsen RE: does Revision 53 from SVN seem slow. [ reply ]   2007-10-17 07:00 What extra color mapping? What kind of framerate did you get with r46 and with r53? By: kyle buttress does Revision 53 from SVN seem slow. [ reply ]   2007-10-17 00:00 I've just updated the libraries here and to me it feels that the extra colour mapping etc stow things a fair bit. As compared to revision 46. Does anyone else have a similar feeling.